Subject:
|
Re: debates (was: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing")
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:48:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1185 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> But also believing that what you see on a soap is litterally true...so much so
> that you write in to the fictional characters is pretty extreme. I'm sure that
> lots of (all?) people are successfully propagandized to varying lesser extents.
> How much of it is good?
>
> I like to have my horizons broadened with new ideas, and TV can be as good as
> anything for that, but what's the difference between exposure to new ideas and
> propaganda? Is it just intent, or a matter of degree?
>
> Chris
I think the bigger question is: What isn't propagandized? Isn't all
advertising propaganda? Isn't every book propaganda? Every medium's main
purpose is to promote its ideas. Isn't the very promotion of ideas propaganda?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
88 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
