Subject:
|
Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:22:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
716 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> "I won't pay any attention to anything Scott says!"... well, ummm... ;)
Hahaha! Guilty. I'm amused that he seems ("seems": I don't read his posts
any more, but I do note what message he is replying to) to be going back and
arguing with old posts of mine since I'm not posting new ones to him. I
mean, pathetic. Trying to goad me into a reply? "Sorry, you're five
minutes are up, I'm not allowed to argue!" :-) No one values his opinions,
so it pretty much doesn't matter what he says. Arguing at him (one can't
argue "with" him) is an utter waste of time.
Bruce
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| (...) Well you seemed to have figured that out (again?? this time?? (1) ) faster than I used to do.. only what, 40-50 posts in that thread between the two of you? Contrast that with me and he(2), we've managed to spin out hundreds of posts in one (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| (...) And my point still stands--whether I'm citing West Wing, the DOI, the Bible or just common sense, what does it matter where the cite came from--if the cite is Just, proper and gosh darn it, makes alotta sense, why does it matter where it came (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
