Subject:
|
Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:44:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
933 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
>
> > "I won't pay any attention to anything Scott says!"... well, ummm... ;)
>
> Hahaha! Guilty. I'm amused that he seems ("seems": I don't read his posts
> any more, but I do note what message he is replying to) to be going back and
> arguing with old posts of mine since I'm not posting new ones to him. I
> mean, pathetic. Trying to goad me into a reply? "Sorry, you're five
> minutes are up, I'm not allowed to argue!" :-) No one values his opinions,
> so it pretty much doesn't matter what he says. Arguing at him (one can't
> argue "with" him) is an utter waste of time.
Well you seemed to have figured that out (again?? this time?? (1) ) faster
than I used to do.. only what, 40-50 posts in that thread between the two of
you?
Contrast that with me and he(2), we've managed to spin out hundreds of posts
in one thread. But not lately. I've gotten a lot better at ignoring his
twaddle. If EVERYONE ignores his responses he mostly goes away and only puts
in the occasional URL from external sources, some of which are even useful
conversation starters.
1 - I could have sworn you were one of the ones urging restraint in the
past... am I misremembering?
2 - grammatically incorrect but has better scansion. Sue me. Oh the
sacrifices we make for Art. Or Bruce or Shirley or whoever...
++Lar
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) Please don't call me Shirley. How does one explain the movie "Airplane" to anyone else? It's one of my favourite "funniest of all-time" movies... it comes across like the Stooges, but (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| (...) Gosh, was it that many? The amusing thing is that in my very first post I noted that my answers to him were not entirely serious, nor did they particularly represent my own viewpoint. As to the "again?? this time??" I must note that I don't (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| (...) Y'know, I've actually thought about Scott's communciation style here a little bit and my general impression is that he, like many of us, tries to read what is here and make reasonably quick responses without getting too bogged down in the (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| (...) Hahaha! Guilty. I'm amused that he seems ("seems": I don't read his posts any more, but I do note what message he is replying to) to be going back and arguing with old posts of mine since I'm not posting new ones to him. I mean, pathetic. (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
