Subject:
|
Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 19:23:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
820 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Well you seemed to have figured that out (again?? this time?? (1) ) faster
> than I used to do.. only what, 40-50 posts in that thread between the two of
> you?
Gosh, was it that many? The amusing thing is that in my very first post I
noted that my answers to him were not entirely serious, nor did they
particularly represent my own viewpoint.
As to the "again?? this time??" I must note that I don't believe I have had
an extended dialogue with Scott before. Generally, I've avoided him.
>
> Contrast that with me and he(2), we've managed to spin out hundreds of posts
> in one thread. But not lately. I've gotten a lot better at ignoring his
> twaddle. If EVERYONE ignores his responses he mostly goes away and only puts
> in the occasional URL from external sources, some of which are even useful
> conversation starters.
That's what amuses me about the continuing attempts by Scott to continue the
discussion. He needs attention for validation. I suppose he is trying to
make me angry, but all I'm doing is laughing harder each new day.
>
> 1 - I could have sworn you were one of the ones urging restraint in the
> past... am I misremembering?
Busted! :-)
But as I noted, I really haven't gotten into it with Scott before, amazing
as that may seem. And I am showing restraint by going into the "ignore"
mode without prompting by others.
>
> 2 - grammatically incorrect but has better scansion. Sue me. Oh the
> sacrifices we make for Art. Or Bruce or Shirley or whoever...
Ooooooooh no. No you don't. No pun wars.
Bruce
(exercising yet more restraint....dang, that's a straight line for a
pun...nononononononomustresist....)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| Snipped for effect. (...) "Again" as in; you previously had it figured out, seemed to have gone through a patch just now where you didn't, and now you do have it figured out "again". NOT as in; you got into it with him before... Helps? (...) As far (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| (...) Well you seemed to have figured that out (again?? this time?? (1) ) faster than I used to do.. only what, 40-50 posts in that thread between the two of you? Contrast that with me and he(2), we've managed to spin out hundreds of posts in one (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
