To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18004
18003  |  18005
Subject: 
Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:25:41 GMT
Viewed: 
771 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:

It's akin to thinking that, "Aha!  I caught you!  I have 'knocked the legs
out from under you' by showing that your quotation comes from a different
source!"  Well, no, you just demonstrated that I have faulty research, the
quotation is still standing out there, with it's "own legs", waiting to be
refuted.

But if we're talking about gun control and you say "in 1780, Jefferson wrote x
in a letter to the Virginia assembly about the meaning of militia" and it turns
out that the quote was actually written by Sarah Brady in 1989, the quotation
is not "still standing out there."  It's sunk!  Sarah Brady doesn't get an
opinion (unless of course, we can show that she has taken care to research it
and is presenting her findings).

Quotations don't exist in a vacuum.  The author, the times, the entire context
from which the quotation is pulled is part of the chain of support that makes
the appeal to authority valuable.  That's the whole reason that we do appeal to
those of perceived wisdom or special knowledge rathern than Moe the bartender.

Chris



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
 
(...) That's a *fantastic* example, and it dovetails nicely with my point in an earlier debate. Mike P is now off the hook for using the false Brady quote: "Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us are (...) (22 years ago, 4-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
 
(...) And, again I agree that appealling to those more intelligent and well versed than ourselves to aid in our defense of a particular point can be a good thing. But if Moe the bartender said something poignant, insightful and relevant to the (...) (22 years ago, 4-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
 
(...) to (...) Well, it seems that I did exactly what I was trying to avoid doing, which was coming in in the middle of another thread given a new header. (22 years ago, 4-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
 
(...) And I agree with everything you have stated above, and I love to find someone who is 'smarter than me' to cite. I would add, however, if I get the source wrong, and the source is refuted, it in no way diminishes what the point was, it just (...) (22 years ago, 4-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

88 Messages in This Thread:

























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR