Debate : 18023


Off-Topic / Debate / 18023	18022 \| 18024

Subject:	debates (was: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing")
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Sun, 6 Oct 2002 11:24:32 GMT
Viewed:	850 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ed Jones writes: > Meaning I thought it was a fresh debate, rather than a carryover of another > debate (which it seems to be). Which debate, though? The one about West Wing, the one about quotations and their merit, or the one about the second amendment? I expect you could steer the threadlette in the direction you wanted it to go. But you would have to deal with the interconnectedness of all these conversations. I don't know how regularly you read .debate, your posting is pretty sporadic (like, what...once a year? :-) But this got me thinking, I wonder how hard it is for someone to "break in" to this group when we regulars have so much ambient knowledge about one another and the previous and ongoing debate topics. Chris

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: debates (was: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing")
(...) Again, I thought John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing" was a totally new debate topic on The West Wing and how the West Wing was not an accurate represenation of the workings of politics and the White House. (...) Probably about once or twice (...) (22 years ago, 6-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
(...) makes (...) Meaning I thought it was a fresh debate, rather than a carryover of another debate (which it seems to be). (22 years ago, 5-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

88 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search