Subject:
|
Re: Customs question...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Nov 2001 21:37:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1224 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> Of course this really is pushing it. It's such a little thing that it's nearly
> inconsequencial. But the principle says that it's an immoral act, even if only
> very minisculy so.
Or the principle says that it's a particularly moral act because you're
standing up, willing to deny funding (in a small way) to a corrupt bureaucracy.
If you think that's so. Those of us who think that governance is bad have it
particularly easy. ;-)
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Customs question...
|
| (...) Agreed I spose-- I was more or less implying my own morality for myself (or was trying), but yes, if you find it to be moral, yeah. However, the more I think about it, the less I can concieve of it being actual "moral", so much as "justified". (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Customs question...
|
| (...) Nope. It doesn't. At least, not in a legal sense Legally, you don't have a say. *Especially* if it's in another country :) Does it matter what you think in terms of how moral you are? Sure. How honest you are? Sure. (...) Ah-- debatably (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
