To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14739
14738  |  14740
Subject: 
Re: Customs question...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:49:25 GMT
Viewed: 
2462 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> > > > Jason, you may be "honesty impaired" -- the condition of engaging in
> > > > unseemly contortions just to be able to claim you were doing the "right
> > > > thing."
> > > 
> > > Is that how you define "honesty"? Or is that how you define "moral"? Is
> > > honesty necessarily moral? If you ask me, if you're honest with respect to
> > > putting the little "gift" mark on a package, then you *DON'T* mark it as a
> > > gift no matter *WHAT* you think of the moral implications of the law that
> > > you're breaking. If you're "honest", you tell the truth. And the truth is
> > > that it's not a gift.
> > 
> > But the act of marking it as a gift might be a gift.  So what then?
> 
> Well, considering that the "gift" denotes the contents of the package (or so
> I would assume the "law" dictates), then no, not really...

But if I sell you an old 3055 (say) for $3 & postage is "Merchandise" more
appropriate than "gift"? Merchandise is more for describing buying from a
commercial organisation. If anyone is selling several thousand dollars worth
pa then perhaps they should be viewed as an commercial entity, but that is
another issue...

Scott A

> 
> DaveE



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Customs question...
 
(...) Not unless you define merchandise as necessarily above a certain cost or from a certain source. I'd say merchandise in this case is when you've paid for the contents of the package. If you only paid shipping, then, sure, mark it as a gift. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Customs question...
 
(...) Well, considering that the "gift" denotes the contents of the package (or so I would assume the "law" dictates), then no, not really... DaveE (25 years ago, 18-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

64 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR