Subject:
|
Re: Customs question...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Nov 2001 21:07:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
633 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> > Jason, you may be "honesty impaired" -- the condition of engaging in
> > unseemly contortions just to be able to claim you were doing the "right
> > thing."
>
> Is that how you define "honesty"? Or is that how you define "moral"? Is
> honesty necessarily moral? If you ask me, if you're honest with respect to
> putting the little "gift" mark on a package, then you *DON'T* mark it as a
> gift no matter *WHAT* you think of the moral implications of the law that
> you're breaking. If you're "honest", you tell the truth. And the truth is
> that it's not a gift.
But the act of marking it as a gift might be a gift. So what then?
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Customs question...
|
| (...) Is that how you define "honesty"? Or is that how you define "moral"? Is honesty necessarily moral? If you ask me, if you're honest with respect to putting the little "gift" mark on a package, then you *DON'T* mark it as a gift no matter *WHAT* (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
