To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 14767
14766  |  14768
Subject: 
Re: Customs question...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 20 Nov 2001 02:54:35 GMT
Viewed: 
1079 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
Bottom line is that *you* don't get to define merchandise, the people who
wrote the form (and made the law) do.  Doesn't matter what you think.

Doesn't matter what I think?  If the duty payment that is at stake is that
of another country, as it is for all of us in the states, then I don't even
care to think about it overmuch.  Some other country's laws is surely
someone else's problem.  If I can help a lego pal out by labelling the
package "gift" -- I mean, really, who cares?  Why are some of you so
vehemently opposed to such a teeny, tiny white lie?  Get over yourselves...

However, your "act of kindness" may result in a lot of extra trouble for the
recipient, if it's proved false. At best, they'll have to pay the duty anyway,
but there may well be other penalties. If they *ask* you to mark it as a gift,
then I agree, it's their problem. But unless they do, I think it's your duty to
be as truthful as possible in the declaration.

ROSCO



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Customs question...
 
(...) How can someone be held accountable for something they did not do? Customs would have to prove that the recipient falsely asked me to mark the package as a gift. Failing that, the recipient has done no wrong -- committed no positive act in the (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Customs question...
 
(...) Yeah, its gets attenuated pretty fast. In the U.S. such a thing has it's origins in congressionally generated legislations, is duplicated by administrative law (sometimes with errors, additions, and omissions), and implemented by people that (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

64 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR