Subject:
|
Re: Customs question...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Nov 2001 16:05:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1330 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> > > so realistically, it's probably the client's decision.
> >
> > Nope. It's only the client's decision if they have that much sway over you.
>
> But even if they don't have that much sway over you, and you choose to say
> "no", they may well choose to say "forget the deal" and you have no decision
> to make anyway (except what to put in the negative feedback comments). So they
> still have (at least a little) say.
Nope. Because you still had to make the decision to say "no" to them :)
And certainly they have the power to make you not have to *make* a decision
by never even beginning to buy your product, but that doesn't affect your
moral valuation, IE what you *would* do. If you *would* brutally murder
babies, but have no babies to brutally murder, are you any more moral?
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Customs question...
|
| (...) client's (...) But even if they don't have that much sway over you, and you choose to say "no", they may well choose to say "forget the deal" and you have no decision to make anyway (except what to put in the negative feedback comments). So (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
