Subject:
|
Re: Customs question...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:44:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1088 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
> Bottom line is that *you* don't get to define merchandise, the people who
> wrote the form (and made the law) do. Doesn't matter what you think.
The form, at least in the US is very terse. There is essentially no
explanatory text. It seems to me that they leave it up to my discretion to use
the form how I see fit.
What do you check if the package contains gifts and merchandise? Both?
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Customs question...
|
| (...) Bottom line is that *you* don't get to define merchandise, the people who wrote the form (and made the law) do. Doesn't matter what you think. thanks, James (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
