Subject:
|
Re: My Toys R Us Nightmare
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.shopping
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Jan 2000 23:43:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
496 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.shopping, Doug Wilcox writes:
> Wait a minute. How is TRU responsible for what happened to your Lego set after
> it left their store? They certainly could not (not would they be expected to
> in any case) have verified that the receipt holder was _not_ you.
Receiving stolen goods: They can't keep something that belongs to someone else.
Proving that or getting them to admit to it or getting them to return the item
or payment is something else entirely.
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: My Toys R Us Nightmare
|
| (...) Hmmm...so lets see,the store accepts an item they carried even though it is now out of stock, and this makes the first one returned to them after a car was broken into stolen? Yes, more likely than not it was PROBABLY the stolen items, but (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: My Toys R Us Nightmare
|
| Wait a minute. How is TRU responsible for what happened to your Lego set after it left their store? They certainly could not (not would they be expected to in any case) have verified that the receipt holder was _not_ you. There is something, (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
