To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.market.shoppingOpen lugnet.market.shopping in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Marketplace / Shopping / 2150
2149  |  2151
Subject: 
Re: My Toys R Us Nightmare
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.market.shopping
Date: 
Fri, 14 Jan 2000 21:26:06 GMT
Viewed: 
550 times
  
In lugnet.market.shopping, Mike Poindexter writes:
I am tired of hearing about that coffee incident being a frivolous lawsuit.
The lady got $300,000 which was later reduced to $100,000 in appeals.  That
was never reported.

  That's interesting; I hadn't heard that previously.

Neither was it reported that the coffee wasn't just hot enough to burn - it
was so hot that they had to do a skin graft.  How hot are they allowed to
sell coffee?  120 degrees?  No problem.  Is 190 degrees legal?  If spilled
on a baby, it could kill.  Would that not be considered negligence?  Just
because somebody thought coffee was too hot doesn't mean that it is just a
person being picky.

  What people generally regard as frivolous, I think, is the fact that she
held the coffee between her legs--do I recall correctly?  To many people's
view this seems to be simply asking for trouble, since while McD's didn't warn
that the coffee was scaldingly hot, they also didn't make any claims about the
leg-proofness of their cup/lid combinations.

My recollection is that the coffee was determined to be 150 degrees - which
is 30 degrees higher than allowed by law for a hot water heater to be set at
for any residence or hotel, for safety reasons.

  Having previously worked in food service for a disappointing length of time,
I can report that many Health departments require certain food products to be
held between 140 and 160 degrees for purposes of sanitation.  Perhaps coffee
is required to be held at a similar temperature?  I'll have to check.

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: My Toys R Us Nightmare
 
Dave Schuler wrote in message ... (...) lawsuit. (...) That (...) it (...) warn (...) the (...) which (...) at (...) time, (...) be (...) coffee (...) I also recall that one of the big issues which always gets left out is that McDonalds had (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: My Toys R Us Nightmare
 
Dave Schuler <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:FoCFKn.FLt@lugnet.com... (...) spilling (...) would (...) I am tired of hearing about that coffee incident being a frivolous lawsuit. The lady got $300,000 which was later reduced to $100,000 in (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.shopping)

61 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR