Subject:
|
Re: Parts Database (Was: Idea: ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Jul 1999 22:11:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1734 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Tore Eriksson writes:
> So far, I've only used LDraw's partlist and Lutz's, but I must say Steve's
> looks very promising.
>
> When it comes to Lego databases, there is an infinite amount of data we all
> wish to enter or seek on. Here's my two ideas to make Mission Impossible a
> little more complicated:
>
> Would it be possible to make a web based database open for everyone to get
> information from but with different levels of write access for trustees?
>
> I have started on a database for my parts. (Who hasn't?) I got this odd idea,
> but yet I think it's useful: Entering stud count for every part! (I mean stud
> or stud2[a] types). It's not always you can determine what theme or category a
> part belongs to, but you can always count the studs on it and suddenly you
> have eliminated many hundred parts from the search.
>
> /Tore
Hi all
A standard naming convention is defenetively a must, weither Ldraw or Aucxilla
or what ever it is,
my self, I build a db for part inventory giving my own Part Number, Description
and it is confusing with all the part auction around.
In a few weeks(months ?) when I will upgrade my home cumputer I might be able
to host a web site for the database( would need some work to make it compatible
with LDraw) or if someone else do it by that time, it would be great to have a
place to find in wich kit that part can be found and also to have a link with
the part image database.
and finally yes, IMO, it would be great to have a group to discuss new part
name and number somewhere in Lugnet.
Martin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
80 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
