Subject:
|
Re: Idea: How starting to work for a unique Lego piece naming convention?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Jul 1999 15:46:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1768 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999 07:15:27 GMT, "Chris Dee" <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Would the plan be to include images for each part in each known colour?
I hope not. That would limit the site to serving up images in predefined
colors. Two bad results: the list of predefined colors could become
outdated, and some people might have a reason for making up their own color
values for parts.
I'd rather see the server handling color-correction, as Frank mentions in
his follow-up.
> For the decorated parts, at least, I would prefer that the image uses a real
> life background colour rather than the default grey. As a reference for parts
> sales, etc it would be confusing to say "this is the part, but actually it is
> red" - thinking here of torsos mainly, which can look unrecognisable in an
> alien colour. Indeed some parts demand this - eg. black castle parts with grey
> decoration.
Very true.
> Also, complex decorated parts (heads, torsos) could benefit from being rendered
> at greater than 100% (with some annotation?)
Hmm.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
80 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
