To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.databaseOpen lugnet.admin.database in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Database / 315
314  |  316
Subject: 
Re: Idea: How starting to work for a unique Lego piece naming convention?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general
Date: 
Tue, 6 Jul 1999 14:00:47 GMT
Viewed: 
1571 times
  
Sybrand Bonsma <bonsma@phys.chem.ethz.ch> wrote in message
news:FEG10M.DFB@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.admin.database, Selçuk Göre writes:
Actually subject line says all. How about making a move about it? Many
efforts ongoing around the community requires this. The first examples that
come to mind are piece auctions, set inventory database and Lego CAD
studies. We have already several half-agreed standards, like Ldraw lib and
Auczilla names, but isn't there a real and (starting to be) urgent need for
a universal naming convention?

What 's your opinions?

I think this is a good idea. If such database is hosted on Lugnet, or a • clear
link to another place everybody can use the same names when they want to
auction/buy/sell/trade pieces. If there are pictures shown of the pieces it
would even be better.
I know there is a database of the pieces in LDraw together with pictures, • maybe
this could be used for this purpose also.

Personal opinions: start with comparing the nomenclature that is used in • LDraw,
Auczilla and the set inventories here on LUGNET. When pieces are named
identical in all three systems this should be adapted, otherwise there • should
be a voting.


The problem is that there are different needs for different applications using
piece names.  LDraw piece categories and sorting are based on the name, which
is why we have some rather tortured names--which wouldn't serve very well for
auctions, etc.

At the same time, if there were voting on standard names, and LDraw names
lost, does that mean LDraw names would be changed?  The result to our
categories and sorting could be very bad.

Perhaps, though, separate LDraw and auction names could be chosen which are
obvious derivatives of each other.

-John Van



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Idea: How starting to work for a unique Lego piece naming convention?
 
(...) My feeling is that it would be good to have a standard set of names for auctions and inventories. It would be nice if LDraw could use these names also, but sounds like there is good reason for it to use a different set of names. Two sets of (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)
  Re: Idea: How starting to work for a unique Lego piece naming convention?
 
(...) To start with the second point you mention: I don't think anyone should be obliged to used the `standard' nomenclature. As you say, for different applications the best name to use can vary for a piece. Even, if one wants to call a 1x1 brick a (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Idea: How starting to work for a unique Lego piece naming convention?
 
(...) I think this is a good idea. If such database is hosted on Lugnet, or a clear link to another place everybody can use the same names when they want to auction/buy/sell/trade pieces. If there are pictures shown of the pieces it would even be (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)

80 Messages in This Thread:































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Database

 
LUGNET Guide updates (Sun 16 Jun 2024)
13 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR