Subject:
|
Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.brictionary
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Jul 1999 20:39:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2078 times
|
| |
|
|
In many newsgroups on lugnet, Jim Hughes wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.database, Steve Bliss writes:
>
>
> > And it's not actually part names, but a parts identification database,
> > right? Having standard/prefered names is good, but it's the pictures (and
> > maybe schematics) that actually identify the part.
>
>
> Steve, I totally agree what is needed is a complete classification/taxonomy
> system so you can find a part. The naming component is useful and interesting
> but this project should be a parts database not just a name database.
>
> If the classification is structured correctly not only should you be easily
> able to find a given part but it should be easy to see similar parts oe see the
> progression of a given part type from its most basic form to its most complex
> form. something like this would help a pretty wide viriety of users.
>
> Jim
> hughesj@one.net
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
80 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
