 | | Re: Stickers
|
|
the way i name my "stickers" are simply 0 ~Sticker:Maersk Logo thats an example.of coarse there are litterally millions of stickers, official and unofficial custom. now the "~" is ment for subparts. and if you think bout it, stickers can be (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Storage and Display of OMR Files
|
|
(...) [...] (...) Nifty-poos. (...) Hmm... it could be more organized nixing the models.sets, but then again the discussion on each subgroup would be pretty minimal that a main group would be almost necessary to keep discussion going. We could of (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: on the word "official" in "OMR"
|
|
(...) But you sound like one :) -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Give an airhead email and its the end of the world - three words: forwarded chain letters. Any questions? (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: on the word "official" in "OMR"
|
|
(...) Sure, feel free to use any or all of it, whatever makes sense. --Todd p.s. Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
one more problem with Version 2.1.0! when setting parimeters, ldraw doesnt comply to settings (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: on the word "official" in "OMR"
|
|
(...) [...] You hit the nail on the head. May I paste that text into the ldraw.org legal page? And then I'd link to it from the OMR page as well. -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Give an airhead email and its the end of the world - three (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
(...) That should be fixed now. Steve (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
(...) I'm having major VEC problems, with pieces and categories not showing up. I'll be working on that... (...) Hmm. I'll fix that, too. Steve (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | on the word "official" in "OMR"
|
|
Pardon me if this has come up somewhere already...I just wanna register a suggestion... On any resource that contains the phrase "Official Model Repository" in the context of LEGO sets, I think it would be a good idea to define what "official" (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Storage and Display of OMR Files
|
|
(...) Ooops, I thought I covered that when I wrote this yesterday about the sets-DB: "Those URLs aren't guaranteed to be the final URLs in the system for sets, but when they move to a better URL nomenclature for sets, there'll be automatic (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: new LDAO version geocities "cant find"
|
|
(...) Sorry, I biffed the HTML. The link should be OK now. This is odd, I don't *remember* having to redo that page after the first posting. And some people did manage to download the file. Odd. Steve (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Stickers (Was: x740 Minifig Vest)
|
|
(...) If we can figure out a standard for constructing, formatting, and naming them, no problem. As you said, the real value would be in high-quality renderings. I would just like to re-iterate that stickers *pre-applied* to pieces is a no-no. But (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | new LDAO version geocities "cant find"
|
|
getting to the page is ok, but i click on the installation file and it comes up not found alternative options? T Burger that crazy marine (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
It gives me a broken link when I click on the installer Steve Bliss wrote in message <37793e92.94991@lugnet.com>... (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Stickers (Was: x740 Minifig Vest)
|
|
Oops. Gotta remember to check all groups before posting. . . (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
After I downloaded the new version of LDAO, I noticed one problem. In the VEC, the only piece that did show up was one that I had moved to a different catergory. It didn't tell me to update the Vec or anything, and all the images were there. I tried (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Stickers (Was: x740 Minifig Vest)
|
|
Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> wrote in message news:377c79d9.335312...net.com... (...) update (...) how (...) be (...) the (...) as (...) I think we should allow stickers. Granted they won't look spectacular in LDraw or LDLite right now, but (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorm Part Numbers
|
|
thinks... another re-numbering of the minifig torso :) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Storage and Display of OMR Files
|
|
(...) Ok, I see. And I can see advantages and disadvantages to that too: Advantages: - Set can be publicly accessible for comments and editing before placed on a site and approved. - Set can be sent to one place and multiple model editors can have (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 3840p01 Minifig Vest with Danger Stripes Stickers (Was: x740 Minifig Vest)
|
|
(...) I recall a long thread about this back on LCAD. I thought we agreed then that stickers should be treated as separate "parts", since they can in theory be stuck anywhere. It kind of got held up because sticker "parts" have only a very small (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Storage and Display of OMR Files
|
|
(...) To add some clarification to the original newsgroup idea, I didn't mean that things like the Lugnet sets-DB would automatically root through the newsgroups and point to any old version of a model that happened to appear in the .models.sets (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) Something to consider here is future expansion into a UNIX-ish (or Java, or Perl/TK, etc.) version of LDraw. The availability of setting startup parameters on the command-line in these cases is essential. (...) Oh. :-, I wonder if I'm a (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) One problem I have with the command-line option is that the command line is already long enough. But that doesn't mean that having the option is bad. (...) I was worried about the user more than the developer. (...) In VB, there's a function (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Storage and Display of OMR Files
|
|
I need some pointers and input on how the OMR should display the download pages and also where the files will be stored. I remember when discussions on the OMR first started the general consensus was to use a Lugnet newsgroup to store the (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) Definitely. (...) Both IMHO are necessary. I do all my non-LDAO (which is quite a bit) LDraw/LDLite stuff from the command-line. VC++ doesn't make it *that* hard to implement exotic command-line parameters, especially if one uses getopt(). I (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
(...) Well, I went and checked again, and you were right about Mover eating the first on each line of header comments. That's been fixed. I've *got* to make Mover do recursive corrections (ie, fix submodels). And directory-wide operations. Steve (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
Yes, They were with 2.1.0, but let me just check... hmm doesn't seem to be doing it, maybe it was on the other one I was using, which was two before this beta. Maybe I was just confused. I was going between the two last night. I'd have both open and (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorm Part Numbers
|
|
Has anyone tried this? This would be a boon to good numbers for LDraw. -John Van Robert Munafo <munafo@gcctech.com> wrote in message news:FE5sz6.Lu0@lugnet.com... (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
Were the problems with Mover and Inliner in the new beta version (2.1.0), or an older version of LDAO? I checked the current code this morning, and both operations seem to work fine, in both \models and subdirectories of \models. The only problem (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
(...) Erk. I will check these. (...) OK, I will check these, too. The whole directory thing is probably going to keep popping up for awhile--previously, I was lazy, and used a lot of hard-coded "\models" as the location of files. Steve (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) A definable search path would be good. Some ideas: 1. An ini-file setting. 2. Several ini-file settings, similar to the [Views] section. Let the user setup as many different ones as he wants, and pick one at render-time. 3. An environment (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
Should we add a search path in the ldraw.ini file? There is a performance hit if you specify the directories in a different order. The first time LDLite finds a reference to a file, it tries to open the file in /p directory, then /parts, etc. Trying (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
One other problem I found is that after using the MOVER, when it gives you the option to save changes, it gives an error when you try to do that. Also I've noticed that the mover will delete a word or two in the header, and if the first line after (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorm Part Numbers
|
|
John (and anyone else involved in part number research) Have you considered writing to LEGO Consumer Affairs? I just called their office in Enfield, CT, USA and they suggested that if I write to them they could give me some part numbers, as long as (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
Scott R Dennett skrev i meddelandet <199906300927010340....te.net>... (...) Do you have an S3 video card? They are having problems with many modern development systems - perhaps Steve upgraded to a newer version of VB? Lower the 'hardware (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
Yeh, I just happened to think of that. Ryan ***...*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***...*** (...) model with (...) models directories, (...) support is only (...) documentation (...) hide the (...) ledit the (...) words: forwarded (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
(...) <dennett@agate.net> (...) stuff isn't (...) That's what I figured, just wanted to make sure though. (...) I (...) to (...) disappearing, (...) part of the (...) disappear, or does (...) The pointer will disappear(like it's gone behind the (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
(...) You can 'fix' the problem by adding in the submodel line in ledit the directory structure under models. Example: mymodel\submodel.dat instead of submodel.dat LEdit will look in models\mymodel\ for the file. -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
(...) Good. :) (...) Hmm. Oh, right; apparently, the file drag-n-drop to directory stuff isn't done, yet. (...) I'm not sure where to start with that one. Is there a specific part of the program where you're having a problem? Does the pointer (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
The subdirectory access makes life a whole lot easier :) The only problems I've foungd so far is that you can not move a file to another directory, but you can place a copy of it there. The other thing is, on the computer I'm on now, the family (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
(...) Oops, forgot that stuff was in there. Yeah, snap-ins would be great, if they ever get implemented. Steve (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
Cool, snap-ins. Steve Bliss wrote in message <37793e92.94991@lugnet.com>... (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [LDAO] New beta version available
|
|
I've uploaded a new beta of LDAO. It includes a bunch of changes, and it needs a good shake-down cruise. I've posted more information, and the download file, on my GeoCities site. Go to (URL) for the whole story. The information there says to e-mail (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Generating Ldraw pieces with consistent face orientation
|
|
Hello! After several months of coding, and after reading an old thread about 'face orientation' in Ldraw files (I can only remember L. Zide was involved here, but can't remember his 'opponent's name), I now have a bunch of Java code to (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can someone please mock-up the pirate boat hulls?
|
|
thanks. i was accually wanting the large hulls from e.g. black seas baracuda etc. (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: an old piece...
|
|
Scott R Dennett <dennett@agate.net> wrote in message news:199906280821290...ate.net... (...) If the parts he used are in the update, he might want to wait, but if they are not, then including them in an .mpd file, or inlining the parts, is quite (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can someone please mock-up the pirate boat hulls?
|
|
(...) i have truly terrible mock-ups of the medium-sized hulls pieces (like those for the 6250-crossbone clipper) which detail stud placement for the interior of the hull but serve NO aesthetic purpose for the exterior of the hull. i'll e-mail these (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: medium-sized ship hulls
|
|
(...) i am referring to the hull pieces most recently seen in the 6250-crossbone clipper and 6280-armada flagship (and in older ships 6268-renegade runner, and 6271 imperial flagship). ..joseph g (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: who made the classic space helment?
|
|
so maybe I'll take a look at it (...) YES, YES, YES, YES!!! please don't even think about giving up on this. Are you going to work on the Fireman torsos from the early '90's as well sometime in the near future. Ryan (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: an old piece...
|
|
(...) thought about? Just (...) everyones enjoyment (...) are not yet (...) dat file for the (...) model. if you do (...) tell you. No, since Terry said he'd probably have the update done this week, you just wait and be patient. Ryan (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: who made the classic space helment?
|
|
(...) Roy Earls did this as an experiment with MAX2DAT (see (URL) to generate a very smooth surfaced part (=large dat file). But last I heard this converter could not create type 2 and type 5 lines in the dat file. I guess there are also some (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: an old piece...
|
|
70969 and 70972 I almost forgot... those pieces are the two tailpipes in set 6561 on the black hot rod... (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: an old piece...
|
|
(...) 1. which pieces are 70969 and 70972? 2. about the sw parts just put them into a mpd file with the model. if you do not know how to do that then someone here should be able to tell you. (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | an old piece...
|
|
have peices 70969 and 70972 been made/attempted or even thought about? Just asking. I am also ready to post some LDrawn models for everyones enjoyment but I have one question: My models use some SW pieces that are not yet authorized, and I was (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about part 4081
|
|
someone made the older style but i can't remember who or where to get it, sorry. (25 years ago, 26-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | can someone please mock-up the pirate boat hulls?
|
|
can someone please mock-up the pirate boat hulls? even a mock-up out of bricks and plates would do for me. i just want to be able to start ldrawing some pirates sets and the boats look like they are the best to do with the parts i have. (25 years ago, 26-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <377286a1.20085558@l...et.com>... (...) directory (...) virtual (...) the (...) oops, oh yeah (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: do these parts exist in ldraw?
|
|
(...) uesd (...) I know what piece you're talking about. I looked through the VEC myself, and didn't see it. For some reason I remember it but it might be a mistake on my part. So I don't think it is there. -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | who made the classic space helment?
|
|
i remember seeing the classic space helment part somewhere... who made it? url for the page to get it? (25 years ago, 26-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: do these parts exist in ldraw?
|
|
(...) is kind of like the sink faucet but is on a raised type of 2 x 2 tile. is uesd in for example metroliner and club car. (...) the set # for the mach 2 red bird rig is 5591. see the page on kl.net to sewe the round red thing. (25 years ago, 26-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: do these parts exist in ldraw?
|
|
(...) Never mind, I had nothing to do, so I made a tap base and a fair tap (so far without the knob) and sent them to Jonathan. Anyone else interested? /Tore (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: do these parts exist in ldraw?
|
|
(...) I believe Jonathan is talking about the 2x2 rings, as found in sets 5591 and 8250. Steve (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "Well-Formed" LDraw (Was: regular expressions for DAT file subpart lines)
|
|
(...) Oh, good. Then I wrote something close to correct. :) (...) That's probably a good idea. Most people will just scratch their heads at them, but some people would find it useful. Steve (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) OK. I've added code for that specific case. I will review the other file commands, and make sure they have protection as well. Steve (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) No, File/New Model File. I don't usually change the names of files while working on them (I always do it outside of the programs), so I've never encountered any other problems like this. Jeff (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: do these parts exist in ldraw?
|
|
(...) It exists deep down in my ToDo-bucket. Will probable not be done by me this millenium... (...) ??? (...) ??? (...) ??? Give me some set numbers... /Tore (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "Well-Formed" LDraw (Was: regular expressions for DAT file subpart lines)
|
|
Hey now, that's beginning to look like the yacc grammer for LDRAW in the LDLite source code. If you want to get precise in the language spec, grab the LDLite lex and yacc files and either take them as the defacto standard or modify them to handle (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: does anyone have the old version of ldlite i need for the ldao minifig modeler?
|
|
You can still dig it up on the site, using (URL) there is no link to it. -gyug (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 2 problems with the btrain motor 9v
|
|
1.it has a small blue area somewhere near the "lugs" on the front. 2.it should be called electric train motor 9v not electric train motor (both to fit in with the decroative side and also so that it can be distinguished from the 12v motor. both (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | do these parts exist in ldraw?
|
|
the tap for the homemaker sink part? the tile 1 x 2 with faucet from the homemaker and trains themes? the wierd round red ring type piece from the model team mach 2 red bird rig plane... see the instructions on kl.net to see which part i am talking (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: url for the parts tracker?
|
|
(...) Tim, Steve is speaking from a very wise standpoint (on many levels). You can never go wrong by offering to host things that people voluntarily contribute. But if people start to get the feeling that there is pressure to contribute or to let go (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) won't (...) in a (...) could be (...) I guess it could work if it is a widely-distributed mockup. If the part number is in the file correctly and in the correct position, no changes would have to be made to that line to get it to work properly (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) That's what I'd say too :) -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: url for the parts tracker?
|
|
(...) True. But it shouldn't be an immediate goal of ours. There's a couple things that hold importance here, the download area and the OMR. Once we get the ball rolling on these we can work on that. Anyways, Steve has a point. But something as (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: medium-sized ship hulls
|
|
which ones are these? are these the ones that are used for example on the new adventurers jungle boat? (25 years ago, 25-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) LDraw and LEdit do not support other directories. Well, they do, sort of. They will look for sub-files in the following locations: - ldraw\p - ldraw\parts - ldraw\models - current directory The last search option is what allows most programs (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) When LDAO starts moving (temporary) files in and out of ldraw\models, what should it do about the files already there? And what if the user launches model1\main.dat into LEdit, but then opens model2\main.dat into l3p? (...) In the File Save (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | medium-sized ship hulls
|
|
is there anyone out there that is working on the medium-sized ship hulls (fore and aft)? i have some truly terrible mock-ups i've made from bricks and plates but i thought i'd check with the professionals before proceeding with a project. thanks (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <37714eef.19012626@l...et.com>... (...) and (...) Ship1.dat (...) Unless you use name mangling... Why don't we just use real dirs, anyway. I'm sure ldlite, ldraw, and ledit support it. What programs do not. (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: a question about modeling the 9v battery box...
|
|
Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote in message news:37723A43.C63B60...ail.com... (...) That would be the ideal, but it would probably get in without that stuff, since the battery box is basically never used such that the insides show. It (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) suggestion. Notice (...) including commentary (...) makes it much (...) comment, it won't (...) correctly place it in a (...) to have to put (...) there could be (...) same as the (...) I think that if it is something like 0 insert piece 2916 (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, we've been asking him to do this for the past couple months, and he has yet to listen. Along with proofreading, we've asked him to keep the message body text from the previous message. *Sigh* Jeff (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
I think you guys are missing the point of Tom's excellent suggestion. Notice the "0" in front of the 2916 line. That means he's just including commentary on where the part will go if and when it becomes official. It makes it much easier to add it in (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | a question about modeling the 9v battery box...
|
|
i have a friend who has a small collection of lego. that is where i origonally got the reference piece for the mast base and 1 x 2 x 1 black grill pannel from, amongst other pieces... this person has the 9v battery box (small). if i were to borrow (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FDu12p.3I1@lugnet.com... (...) meant (...) proof (...) Nice piece of deductive reasoning, Sherlok. -John Van (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "Well-Formed" LDraw (Was: regular expressions for DAT file subpart lines)
|
|
(...) Both of the above are common output from LDAO code. (...) Well, I was just throwing stuff out. I don't know if LDraw would take that one, or not. (...) Darned context-sensitive constructions. (...) I didn't say they made sense. Just that they (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) set, and if (...) the plain (...) file or in the (...) Submit it the set, (...) hatless? Also, what (...) standard smiley? (...) I'd say forget the hat, and smiling might help brighten up someone's day :) Ryan (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) So, what's the ruling on this? Omit the fig or submit it hatless? Also, what if a face design hasn't been created? Use a blank head or a standard smiley? Jeff (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: url for the parts tracker?
|
|
(...) But if it was moved, the script could be refined so that things could be modified or removed as necessary, instead of just adding more info. Jeff (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
(...) with #7 (...) stones (...) Whew... this was difficult to read until I deduced that "3!6 with 38" was meant to read "#16 with #8" (I think). Any chance you can take a little time to proof read your messages ? It would help us to help you. Chris (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) Hey Steve! That is *exactly* what I was thinking! (and I can't think of anytime when you said it, so if you did, I must've missed it.) That would be the way I'd like it done. I think it would make a cleaner directory tree. Jeff P.S. I hope you (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: SW laser cannon name
|
|
(...) We'd better call them "Podracer Energy Binders", then. Why? of the 32 total times this piece is used, half (16) are used as Energy Binders. One fourth of the time they are cannons, one eighth of the time they are used as stabilizers, one (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
(...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: url for the parts tracker?
|
|
(...) I get your point, but something as necessary as the parts tracker should at least contain visible links to ldraw.org, if not be hosted there. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) Correct. Allowing mockups would cause confusion and inconsistency throughout the repository. Comment out the parts that do not exist and leave the part blank. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) without the ghost (...) and the " 0 " NO. NO MOCK-UPS ARE ALLOWED. It doesn't matter wether or not they are commented or not. We decided to use only pieces that are 'official', parts that everyone has. Ryan (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) ok say you know the part #, and oh say you made a mockup, so (before) (ill use 2916 train front) 1 12 -4 50 10 0 0 -1 0 0 1 0 0 -1 2916.file after 0 PART NOT OFFICIAL / MISSING 0 1 12 -4 50 10 0 0 -1 0 0 1 0 0 -1 2916.file thats my idea? (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
what about for example the ghost??? do we put in a minifig without the ghost shawl??? what about the skelleton? do we put in just the skull? (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
