To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 2191
2190  |  2192
Subject: 
Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Thu, 1 Jul 1999 18:54:06 GMT
Reply-To: 
jsproat@geocities.com+IHateSpam+
Viewed: 
1175 times
  
Steve Bliss wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dev, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
Steve Bliss wrote:
4. A command-line option.  Not necessarily a good idea (how many people
launch LDLite from the command line?  I'd guess very few), but LDAO could
pass stuff this way.
Both IMHO are necessary.
One problem I have with the command-line option is that the command line is
already long enough.  But that doesn't mean that having the option is bad.

Something to consider here is future expansion into a UNIX-ish (or Java, or
Perl/TK, etc.) version of LDraw.  The availability of setting startup
parameters on the command-line in these cases is essential.

I do all my non-LDAO (which is quite a bit)
LDraw/LDLite stuff from the command-line.  VC++ doesn't make it *that* hard
to implement exotic command-line parameters, especially if one uses
getopt().
I was worried about the user more than the developer.

Oh.  :-,

I wonder if I'm a special case, being a user who prefers the command-line to
a GUI?

So what should the precedence be for each of these settings? Assuming they are
ever implemented, of course.  I'd suggest the following, going from high to
low:
1. Interactive selections (from Options menu)
2. Command-line options
3. 0 CMDLINE meta-statement
4. Ini-file setting
5. Environment variable

This list looks good to me.

Cheers,
- jsproat

--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
Darth Maul Lives



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
 
(...) One problem I have with the command-line option is that the command line is already long enough. But that doesn't mean that having the option is bad. (...) I was worried about the user more than the developer. (...) In VB, there's a function (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

23 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR