| |
In lugnet.admin.database, Selçuk Göre writes:
> Actually subject line says all. How about making a move about it? Many
> efforts ongoing around the community requires this. The first examples that
> come to mind are piece auctions, set inventory database and Lego CAD
> studies. We have already several half-agreed standards, like Ldraw lib and
> Auczilla names, but isn't there a real and (starting to be) urgent need for
> a universal naming convention?
>
> What 's your opinions?
I think this is a good idea. If such database is hosted on Lugnet, or a clear
link to another place everybody can use the same names when they want to
auction/buy/sell/trade pieces. If there are pictures shown of the pieces it
would even be better.
I know there is a database of the pieces in LDraw together with pictures, maybe
this could be used for this purpose also.
Personal opinions: start with comparing the nomenclature that is used in LDraw,
Auczilla and the set inventories here on LUGNET. When pieces are named
identical in all three systems this should be adapted, otherwise there should
be a voting.
Greetings,
Sybrand Bonsma
Unofficial Fabuland Homepage:
http://members.tripod.com/~Sybrand_Bonsma/fabu1eng.html
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Idea: How starting to work for a unique Lego piece naming convention?
|
| (...) For a lot of basic bricks, plates, tiles, etc, we seem to do OK. But other areas we seem to have trouble with the piece names. One area in particular that I've seen some problems are sloped brick peaks or apex bricks. Let's start there. Do we (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
80 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
