 | | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Alright, I didn't want to jump into this one to continue a thread with a seemingly offensive title (which is worse than strting it, IMHO), but this is a bit much. Frustration over what Matt thought he saw happening was perfectly justified. I (...) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) My path leads forward. Please don't trip me. -Suzanne Rich LUGNET Admin (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Perhaps, then, it is time to ban him. A little refresher reading for everyone: (URL) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Words are less important than the way in which they are used: "...LEGO sucks for bending over and letting the Maori ream them like this..." isn't particularly nice language. And not "giving a rat's @$$" about a culture isn't very nice either. (...) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) I (...) now (...) standard (...) argue (...) the (...) unfortunatly, creating a "standard" like that is a very hard (if not impossible) thing to do. For instance, saying "This set is crap" is very very different (at least in my mind) from (...) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Suz, May I commend you on a terrific decision. Dan actually already contacted me to get the LUGMAP updated which was a long time in comming and its already done!! You could not have picked 3 more upstanding members of the community! I look forward (...) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:200110311220.f9...ron.com... (...) My concern in this paragraph is some inconsistency I'm perceiving. Where I recall her not being concerned about this [particular word] before, but now it appears (...) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) post, (...) exactly. (...) claiming (...) find (...) I really don't think that LUGNET should have as low standards as TV does. but that's besides the point. I think if Suz asked it to be toned down, that's the end of the story - why argue with (...) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
"LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:GM12pn.H5B@lugnet.com... (...) Uhh? With all due respect, I'm not quite following. Reading Matt's post, the only words I see in there are 'crap,' 'suck,' and a numerical representation for a (...) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) Since you brought it back up, lugnet.org *IS* registered to Todd/Suzanne (same address at WHOIS). However, lugnet.net is registered with the *EXTREMELY* evil Name Zero. If you need to register a domain, but can't afford to pay alot, DON'T GO (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) I am working on fixing this... Voyager lost my space and I have to restore it. It's due for a revamp and I was holding off on that revamp till I had time but I forgot how extensively it's linked. So I will put it back as is... some of the (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) lugnet.org and lugnet.net are not currently in use or registered by anyone. It does appear that both are held by reputable web hosting firms at this time. . (25 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Todd, where are you? (was Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**)
|
|
(...) Whether it was hijacked or the bill wasn't paid (on or off purpose), I know that something is strange regarding AucZILLA's loss. My own personal loss revolves around this important issue. I'm still waiting on items that I bid on and paid for (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Space sets 4 sale! Check it out!
|
|
(...) D'oh! I just re-read the post and realized that I didn't make it clear that *I* didn't think they were irrelevant (they were OK with me)--my implication was that those were the posts that MH was talking about. I didn't intend to make that (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Space sets 4 sale! Check it out!
|
|
(...) FTR, the bunnnies were on-topic, we just didn't need the list anymore (and it was bogging down some newsreader users). Matt (25 years ago, 28-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) Interestingly, this has also happened to another site intended to be family-friendly: (URL) Dave! (I read LUGNET for the articles) FUT Where? (25 years ago, 26-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Roolz! But can I cancel from the web?
|
|
(...) there one? not yet - you can cancel from a newsreader, I believe, or you can write to admin@lugnet.com with the url you need canceled, and Suz can do it for you. HTH. Dan (25 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Roolz! But can I cancel from the web? (was: Re: WTB: Infiltrator / Podracer 2-pack, MIMP:
|
|
(...) Nope...you have to ask via e-mail. E-mail admin@lugnet.com and ask to cancel the post you would like deleted. Include your name, and the URL http link to the post you wish to have deleted. And yes, LUGNET *does* "rool" doesn't it? Matt (25 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Lugnet Roolz! But can I cancel from the web? (was: Re: WTB: Infiltrator / Podracer 2-pack, MIMP: $50
|
|
Found what I was looking for-- offer closed, thanks for reading. I looked for a web-UI way to cancel posts, but I didn't find one. Is there one? Kevin (25 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: LUGNET by email
|
|
(...) Figures...as soon as I say something, it stops happening... --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (25 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET by email
|
|
I've only been getting the one copy each time (normally i'm a victim too when this happens). (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET by email
|
|
I've been receiving every message twice for the past couple days. Is the problem on my end or is something wrong with LUGNET's mail sender? --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (25 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
A little off-topic, but anyone or anywhere that has linked to my.voyager.net/~lar/ is going to get 404 Not Found. This includes the trains newsgroup, or anyone searching Google for "lego extended vision caboose" where a page from there comes up as (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: BricksWest LUGNET Group
|
|
(...) Oh, ok. I must have missed that message. Understandable. (...) Sure thing. -Tim (25 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: BricksWest LUGNET Group
|
|
(...) Tim, Suzanne mentioned that she was out-of-town for a few days. You should cut her some slack. Until such time as a group is created for focused discussion of BricksWest, you should feel free to discuss BW in lugnet.events. It's perfectly (...) (25 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | BricksWest LUGNET Group
|
|
Todd & Suz - The original request for a BricksWest group under .events was made over a week ago. The members of the planning committee feel its important to the event to have a discussion group on LUGNET. Please set this up as soon as possible. (...) (25 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Can you delete this one please
|
|
Suzanne Can you delete this one please: (URL) this (URL) for the hassle. Scott A (25 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) Don't worry about this one. -Suz (25 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Adding My Site's Link
|
|
(...) Here's the deal: I have rcv'd requests from AFOLs, but can't give them top priority today. I'm facing tasks in line ahead of LUGNET. One of those tasks involves making it easier to prevent log-jams like this in the future. I don't expect this (...) (25 years ago, 22-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Cool Lego Site of the Week?
|
|
I know the reasons behind the lack of update, but why not make it Cool Lego Site of the Month (CLSOTM) to make up for lack of time? Rick (25 years ago, 21-Oct-01, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) It won't expire until 2003. However, the loss of fibblesnork.com will make it very hard for Todd to update the domain... Registrant: LEGO Users Group Network / Fibblesnork Software (LUGNET-DOM) 243 White Street Belmont, MA 02178 US Domain (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) Correct of course...so let's keep an eye out for this, and help keep Suzanne/Todd up to date if it seems like it is in danger of being lost (not that I think that will happen...I'm just sayin'...). From WHOIS: Registrant: LEGO Users Group (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) musing (...) lugnet.com? Would be bad if that one got lost... Kevin ---...--- Craftsman Lego Kits & Custom models: (URL) Lego parts store: (URL) Lego auctions: (URL) Guild of Bricksmiths: (URL) Lego Web (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Adding My Site's Link
|
|
(...) Well, all I know is that I requested the curatorship of .build.mecha a few months back and I'm still awaiting a response. There's nothing quite as frustrating as waiting for a call that never comes. Kinda feels like high school all over again. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) <snip> (...) <snip> (...) Oh yeah...no problems really...just playing "Todd's advocate" here (doesn't have the same evil connotation as devil's advocate...or *does* it? Mwah-ha-ha-ha!) I also hate to see domains get lost, either (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) In one sense I totally agree. We lost nothing. HE lost his property. But in another I do not agree. While Todd has no obligation to anyone to keep his domains owned, I did *indeed* suffer a loss when Fibblesnork went away. I lost time I would (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) I think Todd would be the first to say that "we" haven't lost anything...another case of his domain, his loss, his potential problem. As you, Larry, and others have touched on quite recently, Auczilla just ain't a going concern right now (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) Ok, do we maybe need to collectively scratch our heads and develop a list of commonly linked sites that we the community need to watch? That is, keep an eye on their name expiration and if it gets close and the owner isn't keeping things up, (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) Ut oh...here we go again! This one is VERY invasive, and there is no buffer page this time. Matt (25 years ago, 20-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
:( Pretty much what it says, I'm afraid. Please update your links appropriately. (thanks to Joel McKale for giving me the heads up; he's not where he can post right now, but dropped me a line) thanks, James (crossposted for visibility, FUT to (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-01, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Adding My Site's Link
|
|
Yes Yes!! Meeeee toooo I'm ready to add my link! Legomaster's Lego Continuum (URL) Stuart, I figured I'd just be patient. I know you said your site was getting an over haul or somthing....infact please let me know so I can add your link to my site! (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Adding My Site's Link
|
|
(...) That would be nice... there are at least a few links currently on the page that no longer work, and naturally, there are always more being created (right Eric? ;ç) (bit of snot on that emoticon, I think) stuart (25 years ago, 19-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Adding My Site's Link
|
|
(...) I'm working from poor memory but I think the curator technology IS in place and some groups have curators, you can tell because the curators have added lots of info. If I were a curator of a group, the first thing I would do would be modify (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Adding My Site's Link
|
|
(...) Well, Dave and Eric have been tossing the ideas around I think, Read the replies to this message: (URL) soon as the curator is in place, I think we'll see a humongous update to that links page, -Geordan- (25 years ago, 19-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Adding My Site's Link
|
|
(...) As far as I know, there *is* no process yet. Soon (or not-so-soon), Suzanne will be implementing the curator idea, and you would be able to email the curator. Methinks there already is one at .build.mecha, but I'm not sure who. HTH, -Shiri XP (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing BricksWestT 2002 - The West Coast LEGO® Fan Event
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GL93tv.48x@lugnet.com... (...) months. (...) Yes, please add this as a group. There's still a lot to talk about the event and I think having the newsgroup is an important thing. -Tim (25 years ago, 19-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Adding My Site's Link
|
|
Hey, umm... can I get the link to my lego site ((URL) to the list of websites under lugnet.build.mecha? I'm not sure of the process for that so I figured this would be the best place to start... (25 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: rude (Re: eBay's Auction for America)
|
|
(...) Nope, I'm wrong. I mailed it to "suz@lugnet.com". Scott A (25 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: rude (Re: eBay's Auction for America)
|
|
(...) I tried. I can't. (...) I think I did yesterday. I even gave URLs? Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: rude (Re: eBay's Auction for America)
|
|
(...) The policy above applies. Send detailed mail to: admin@lugnet.com -Suz LUGNET Admin (25 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: rude (Re: eBay's Auction for America)
|
|
(...) Just as a procedural note, for anyone reading this, not just Scott, it has been my experience that "this" (as used above) as a referent isn't sufficiently precise. What Todd always seemed to want was a note sent to him with the specific post (...) (25 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
Larry, I not I am not going to bicker with you in this group. If Suzanne is not clear on what I have said, she is welcome to contact me either via this group or e-mail. I have read your jaundiced view, and I am still happy with my posts in this (...) (25 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
Larry, I not I am not going to bicker with you in this group. If Tim is not clear on what I have said, he is welcome to contact me either via this group or e-mail. Scott A (25 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
(...) If everyone but you thinks you are off topic, does that mean you are, whether you think you are or not? You like democracy and majority rule. (...) His post was a response and had followups correctly set. (...) I am sure we all would love to. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
(...) A fool would think that you had, yes, but Todd has repeatedly stated here in admin general that he does not make editorial decisions. Which you would know if you read this group. I expect Suzanne to continue that wise policy. You would need to (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
(...) Nope. I started this sub-thread. I instigated it. This is in l.a.g as someone is trying to rub me up the wrong way (I expect that is clear to everyone). I am yet to be convinced that I was off-topic. But, if we are blowing the dust of the (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
(...) Even a fool can see that I have given her the authority to do so if she thinks they were off-topic. (...) That is why I said "if that can be done" (...) No, what I said was this: "If Suzanne reads my posts and thinks they are off-topic, she is (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
"Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:GLAHKt.C9B@lugnet.com... (...) post. (...) opinion). (...) and insensitive to the tragedy which occured within a mile of LD, you spin this to make it look like John was the instigator. If you (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
(...) It is against LUGNET policy to cancel posts, even for major ToS violations, unless the circumstances are very extreme. (1) YOU need to request that the posts be cancelled, else LUGNET is exercising editorial control which they only very rarely (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing BricksWest™ 2002 - The West Coast LEGO® Fan Event
|
|
I agree with Larry. It would certainly help locate topics and discussions directly related to the convention. Todd or Suzanne, are you out there listening? Todd (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
If Suzanne reads my posts and thinks they are off-topic, she is welcome to cancel them, or even transfer them to OTD (if that can be done). Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
(...) 4 points: 1) It was because I have some consideration towards people that I made the post. 2) The post was about Lego direct - it was not off.topic chat (in my opinion). 3) I was debating nothing. What I said is my view, and calling me "rude" (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Cool LEGO Site of the Week
|
|
I know it's difficult to keep a website updated, but Cool LEGO Site of the Week seems to have become Cool LEGO Site of the Month... ...which is a pity since I'm sure I'm not the only one who enjoys reading the reviews and visiting new sites I've (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GL9GMv.JFp@lugnet.com... (...) I'm not too comfortable with me too posts, but I'd like to second your comments, Larry. I've been rather irritated and offended by the rudeness of (...) (25 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: . market for HTML?
|
|
(...) Well, I'm not in the NNTP crowd, but I still think allowing HTML in posts would be a Bad Thing (even just in .market). I suppose the only thing I could see doing would be allowing FTX pages to be "posted" since they're less likely to break (...) (25 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
Scott, you have been asked, twice, to keep this topic in .debate yet you repeatedly redirect it back to lego.direct. How rude. The lego.direct newsgroup is for direct communication, not prolonged discussion. You are in violation of the charter for (...) (25 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: . market for HTML?
|
|
"David Lukens" <dml6@po.cwru.edu> wrote in message news:3BCAD925.305070...wru.edu... (...) buyers (...) for a (...) all (...) .market (...) Same here. I'm anti-HTML email too. (o-t: anyone know how to filter out HTML email in Outlook? Then again, I (...) (25 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing BricksWest™ 2002 - The West Coast LEGO® Fan Event
|
|
(...) Awesome news. Suggest that an events.brickswest be set up, just as an events.brickfest was... something tells me there is going to be a fair bit of discussion (some along the lines of Tim provoking a Matt-toot of his horn, of course all in (...) (25 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.events, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: . market for HTML?
|
|
(...) It was not a call for a vote, just a suggestion. Scott A (25 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: . market for HTML?
|
|
(...) This is a NNTP feed. I do not enjoy it when people mistake a news post for a web page (or IE document, but that is another rant). If people want to do all the glitz, let them make a webpage somewhere and post the link into .market My vote is (...) (25 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: . market for HTML?
|
|
no, if so they have have a page for that and post the link here. This will be useful as it doesn't take more time/bandwith here, and the page remains.... Sonnich Scott A <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:GL71oq.MHM@lugnet.com... (...) (...) (25 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: . market for HTML?
|
|
(...) I agree with Chris, not sure I see how turning the market group into a Flashfest helps anyone. The links are there (in well crafted posts), and those interested can click them to learn more. But those just skimming should not pay the heavy (...) (25 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: . market for HTML?
|
|
(...) In what way would the use of HTML help either the buyers or the sellers? You can readily put links in straight text, and browser-based newsreaders will notice them and allow direct clicking on them. Opening up any group to HTML only opens them (...) (25 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | . market for HTML?
|
|
Most of the threads started in the .market groups are basically advertsiments. Is it time we allowed HTML posts in this group to help buyers *&* sellers? Or are the text only NTTP crowd holding up progress! Scott A (25 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.brickshops)
|
| |
| | Link update request
|
|
Could someone revise the RcxCC version 3.2 link on the lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc page to something like the following: <a href="(URL) Bricx Command Center (formerly known as RcxCC v3.2) </a> Thanks. John Hansen (25 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW Featured Item at the Yellow Castle Marketplace (week of Oct 8)
|
|
(...) Maybe so but that's not what I am currently advocating. And it's not how the charter reads. Once you open a charter discussion, you are open to all charter change suggestions, even ones that take the charter in the opposite direction from your (...) (25 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW Featured Item at the Yellow Castle Marketplace (week of Oct 8)
|
|
(...) But I thought the whole reason the .brickshops subgroup was created was to eliminate from .bst all of the post like "My Brickbay shop has new parts" or "My Brickbay shop is 10% off" plus all of the discussion posts like you want in (...) (25 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW Featured Item at the Yellow Castle Marketplace (week of Oct 8)
|
|
(...) No, that is not correct. Perhaps I didn't post my mod very clearly ("straight sale" gets expanded explicitly to include third party shops and Cary's prohibition against them is struck) but my intent is that BST, and not .brickshops, is the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW Featured Item at the Yellow Castle Marketplace (week of Oct 8)
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) So if I am selling a set on my site, I can't post to .bst by both of your modified charters, right? (...) As I read it, my post would be correct under Cary's modified charter, but not under Larry's. Larry's seems to only allow (...) (25 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW Featured Item at the Yellow Castle Marketplace (week of Oct 8)
|
|
(...) Me too and proud of it. Excessively so, some would say, witness the recent kerfluffe around posting buildings in trains.org... (...) Me too. (...) I think a charter clarification is a great idea as well (and while we're at it maybe we could (...) (25 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW Featured Item at the Yellow Castle Marketplace (week of Oct 8)
|
|
OK, I admit it. I'm a compartmentalized dork. I would prefer messages like this (see below) to appear in one group. Yet, reading the charters for all three groups, there's nothing that directs Ben to choose one group over the other two, so he posts (...) (25 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with full screen pop-up window for set pictures.
|
|
(...) nod, you're right - in the java code that pops up the window, it specifies "scrollbars=0" which disables the scrollbars on the new window. Todd, perhaps this should be changed? as a workaround, you can either disable javascript, or right click (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with full screen pop-up window for set pictures.
|
|
Yeah, sorry about that, my screen is 1600x1200 - so when I size a picture for 800 on the longest edge, it's comparatively small on my screen... I'll try to keep it to a minimum - I was a little anxious to get a better picture up - than the catalog (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Problems with full screen pop-up window for set pictures.
|
|
When I try to view a set such as (URL) I find that the window is too big for my 800x600 screen I normally use here and have to go to 1024x768 to see the whole picture. There are also no scroll bars so I can scroll the picture around. I play games a (...) (25 years ago, 30-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Signing in/ Membership packet
|
|
Hello, all, I seem to have a fuzzy memory of a membership package coming with the membership?... Has there been a change on this, or are things like somebody's real life getting in the way? ;) Also, on the homepage, there's a place to sign in, but I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with News By Mail?
|
|
(...) See admin.nntp, it's known and being worked. I always forget but .nntp is, I think, the place to discuss news related issues... Hope that helps. (25 years ago, 26-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with News By Mail?
|
|
(...) I'm told by other rtlToronto folks that they are having a similar problem-below is a forward from Richard Noeckel. Calum --text from Richard below-- Hi Calum, Here are a few individuals who I've found to be having similar problems accessing (...) (25 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with News By Mail?
|
|
(...) I'm not receiving any email either (none yesterday evening or this morning). --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu (URL) (25 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Problem with News By Mail?
|
|
Anyone having a problem receiving LUGNET E-mails? I had a prolem with my e-mail server last night, but as far as I can tell, it is working fine now, but I am not getting any e-mail from LUGNET. I checked my subscriptions, and they all seem to be (...) (25 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: cant post to rtl
|
|
(...) Actually, what Chris means is he can't post to the rtlToronto NG. Up here in Toronto, we've gotten into a habit of calling rtlToronto, "rtl". Of course, we all know that rtl is rec.toys.lego, the rtl in rtlToronto is derived from that. It's (...) (25 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: cant post to rtl
|
|
(...) Well, for starters, RTL is most definitely NOT Lugnet. Different things. (...) I'm guessing you mean you tried to post to Lugnet-- not to RTL-- and it does look like your message didn't get here. My guess is either there's an email problem or (...) (25 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Problems with the LUGNET Gear pages
|
|
Suzanne/Todd, I was setting up a Cafe Press account today, and thought I'd give you the referral. I wanted to get your store ID, so I went to the Gear pages...since you did your own thing there, I tried placing an order, hoping to get to a Cafe (...) (25 years ago, 25-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet 'Unsuitable for viewing).
|
|
"LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:GJM8L0.3y5@lugnet.com... (...) If they use the Recreational Software Advisory Council service (it comes with ie) Lugnet does not have a certificate(?), so it will deny access. Scott A (...) on (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorting Air Safety (Re: Rooting out nests of snakes and destroying them)
|
|
"Dave Low" <stinglessbee@hotSPA...Email.com> wrote in message news:GJx646.ICw@lugnet.com... (...) of angry (...) picture. (...) Show (...) I actually replied to myself. Scott A (25 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Eat this!!!!!
|
|
(...) Yes, you got that part right. (...) ??? Is this some kind of joke too? Where does eliticism enter here? You expressed bad form, people told you so. (...) It wasn't received as a joke, hence the reactions. (...) Of course I didn't notice, not (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Eat this!!!!!
|
|
(...) reaaaaaaal dry or simplistic. im sorry. dont count on me posting much anymore due to a) elitists, b) NOT ONE PERSON can take a joke... and c) if you didnt notice, i XFUT to OT.fun. rick (25 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Eat this!!!!!
|
|
"Rick Hallman" <legodude725@removeaol.com> skrev i meddelandet news:GK4JGt.HGB@lugnet.com... (...) With all due respect to the suffering Americans, I don't think this has anything to do with Lego, and it's certainly not following the rules for (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
