To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 9650
9649  |  9651
Subject: 
Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:20:16 GMT
Viewed: 
184 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Tim Courtney wrote:
"LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message
news:GM12pn.H5B@lugnet.com...

Tone down the language.

-Suz
LUGNET Admin

Uhh? With all due respect, I'm not quite following. Reading Matt's • post,
the only words I see in there are 'crap,' 'suck,' and a numerical
representation for a third word, '@$$.'

exactly.

I can't find the quote, but I do recall vividly you in a post once • claiming
something along the lines that a-- was not even censored on TV (and
subsequently didn't make a big deal about it being posted here).  I did • find
a couple canceled posts by you when I searched 'a--,' though.

I really don't think that LUGNET should have as low standards as TV does.
but that's besides the point.  I think if Suz asked it to be toned down,
that's the end of the story - why argue with it?  Did LUGNET become a
democrocy overnight while I wasn't looking?

Other than that, is there something wrong with Matt expressing his
frustration over this issue (note, *before* Brad clarified in his post
today)?  Is there something wrong with inflammatory language towards the
tribe and towards LEGO [1] - when it all boils down, Matt stating his
opinion?

when did swearing become the only way of expressing frustration?  I've no
doubt that Matt could have posted a message showing just how frustrated he
was without using a single swear word. Everyone is allowed to state their
opinion, afaik, but some ways are not welcome on LUGNET.  You want to cuss
and swear, go right ahead - but don't do it in Suz's sandbox.

[1] Not that I believe inflammatory language solves much in this case, or
other cases dealing with LEGO.

or really any other cases.  Not saying I don't use bad language, just that
I shouldn't.

Dan



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
 
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:200110311220.f9...ron.com... (...) My concern in this paragraph is some inconsistency I'm perceiving. Where I recall her not being concerned about this [particular word] before, but now it appears (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
 
"LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:GM12pn.H5B@lugnet.com... (...) Uhh? With all due respect, I'm not quite following. Reading Matt's post, the only words I see in there are 'crap,' 'suck,' and a numerical representation for a (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

14 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR