Subject:
|
Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:46:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
229 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Tim Courtney wrote:
> My concern in this paragraph is some inconsistency I'm perceiving. Where • I
> recall her not being concerned about this [particular word] before, but • now
> it appears she is. Is the standard the same for all? I have no problem
> adhering to a standard that limits profane language, just keep the • standard
> consistent.
>
> If 'a--' is not acceptable for LUGNET, I will not use it, nor will I • argue
> the point. But, shouldn't the standard be set and be consistent across • the
> board?
unfortunatly, creating a "standard" like that is a very hard (if not
impossible) thing to do. For instance, saying "This set is crap" is very
very different (at least in my mind) from saying CRAP x 12 in the title of
a post. And getting worse as you read through the post. Yes, it's
borderline, but if we let such posts get by, the border just gets pushed.
A reasonable guideline would be "if you need to think if your post is
acceptable, you probably need to reword it".
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
