Subject:
|
Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 05:27:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
288 times
|
| |
|
|
"LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message
news:GM12pn.H5B@lugnet.com...
>
> Tone down the language.
>
> -Suz
> LUGNET Admin
Uhh? With all due respect, I'm not quite following. Reading Matt's post,
the only words I see in there are 'crap,' 'suck,' and a numerical
representation for a third word, '@$$.'
I can't find the quote, but I do recall vividly you in a post once claiming
something along the lines that a-- was not even censored on TV (and
subsequently didn't make a big deal about it being posted here). I did find
a couple canceled posts by you when I searched 'a--,' though.
Other than that, is there something wrong with Matt expressing his
frustration over this issue (note, *before* Brad clarified in his post
today)? Is there something wrong with inflammatory language towards the
tribe and towards LEGO [1] - when it all boils down, Matt stating his
opinion?
Genuinely curious,
-Tim
[1] Not that I believe inflammatory language solves much in this case, or
other cases dealing with LEGO.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
14 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
