Subject:
|
Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:03:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
348 times
|
| |
|
|
If Suzanne reads my posts and thinks they are off-topic, she is welcome to
cancel them, or even transfer them to OTD (if that can be done).
Scott A
In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Tim Courtney writes:
> > "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
> > news:GL9GMv.JFp@lugnet.com...
> > > Scott, you have been asked, twice, to keep this topic in .debate yet you
> > > repeatedly redirect it back to lego.direct.
> > >
> > > How rude.
> > >
> > > The lego.direct newsgroup is for direct communication, not prolonged
> > > discussion. You are in violation of the charter for the group when you
> > > expound your pet social theories there, and engage in *debate* about them.
> > >
> > > Perhaps this topic is now best directed to admin.general since you're
> > > violating group charters, repeatedly, without remorse.
> >
> > I'm not too comfortable with me too posts, but I'd like to second your
> > comments, Larry. I've been rather irritated and offended by the rudeness of
> > Scott's postings and his lack of consideration towards people (in this case
> > the people at LEGO Direct, and the people reading the group).
>
> 4 points:
> 1) It was because I have some consideration towards people that I made the post.
> 2) The post was about Lego direct - it was not off.topic chat (in my opinion).
> 3) I was debating nothing. What I said is my view, and calling me "rude"
> won't change it.
>
> As for the charter. Read this:
> ==+==
> This new .lego.* area (especially .lego.direct) is intended more as a
> "community dialogue with the LEGO Company -- for courteous and concise
> discussion" than as a regular traffic discussion group.
> ==+==
>
> Now read John Neal's message:
> http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=3425
>
> Scott A
>
>
> >
> > -Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
| (...) It is against LUGNET policy to cancel posts, even for major ToS violations, unless the circumstances are very extreme. (1) YOU need to request that the posts be cancelled, else LUGNET is exercising editorial control which they only very rarely (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
| (...) 4 points: 1) It was because I have some consideration towards people that I made the post. 2) The post was about Lego direct - it was not off.topic chat (in my opinion). 3) I was debating nothing. What I said is my view, and calling me "rude" (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
