 | | Re: The LEGO Racers theme should have its own newsgroup.
|
|
(...) Yup. I would also add that creating a .technic.racers subgroup is a BAD idea - Racers is in no way a subtheme of Technic, as many sets have nothing to do with Technic. (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Racers theme should have its own newsgroup.
|
|
FUT: lugnet.technic "Ray Sanders" <rsanders@svic.net> wrote in message news:HpGEq9.237B@lugnet.com... (...) Actually, it raises the question. Begging the question would be like saying "When is Lego going to stop retiring themes?!?" or "When did you (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Racers theme should have its own newsgroup.
|
|
FUT: lugnet.admin.suggestions I have to agree. I just discussed something similar with the folks over at brickset.com - eventually they agreed. Even though it started as a subset of technic, it has expanded and is truly it's own Lego theme. Now all (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Racers theme should have its own newsgroup.
|
|
(...) into a 'theme' of it's own based on the scale of the figs. I personally don't have a preference for or against a 'Racers' newsgroup, but this thread led me to this interesting minifig mulling. Jeff (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Racers theme should have its own newsgroup.
|
|
(...) Hey, wow, you know you are right! Our bad. ;) e (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Racers theme should have its own newsgroup.
|
|
(...) Even though Bionicle had the 'Technic' label once, it still has its own newsgroup here. Plus most of the Racers sets are in no way Technic as pointed out in another post in this thread. So IMHO 'Racers' MORE than deserves its own newsgroup. (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Racers theme should have its own newsgroup.
|
|
(...) I would say the answer is "no"... (URL) seems like they're just being more selective with using that title. -Paul D. (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Racers theme should have its own newsgroup.
|
|
(...) The Technic name still exists on the boxes of 2003 sets such as 8454, 8455, 8453, 8438 etc. Now, if ALL Racers sets were Technic flavored, there would be no point in having a separate newsgroup (just as there is no point to have a World City (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The LEGO Racers theme should have its own newsgroup.
|
|
(...) Maybe. I think 'Racers' is a branding thing that LEGO has choosen to do. To explain, sometime around the beginning of the 2002 set year, LEGO deleted the Technic moniker from most (possibly all) set boxes. Various Bionicle sets, which had (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: password reset request
|
|
(...) Is there any way I could get a reset before 2004? Please? (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | The LEGO Racers theme should have its own newsgroup.
|
|
Granted, many sets of theme are Technic flavored (those with mostly technic parts), and many are slighly Town flavored (those with a minifig, pull back motor and mostly bricks/plates). But the theme still hasn't got its own LUGNET newsgroup, and (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions) !
|
| |
| | Re: Who is in charge of what? (not a curator question)
|
|
(...) Thomas Garrison and I are data base administrators. Not sure who the others are. I believe there are other areas of administration that people other than Todd have. Frank (22 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Who is in charge of what? (not a curator question)
|
|
(...) From the top of my head and not meant to be an exhaustive list (I agree that a consolidated list of people/things would be good) There are no moderators per se, because LUGNET is not a moderated system, posts only get cancelled (barring (...) (22 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Who is in charge of what? (not a curator question)
|
|
Is there a page, list or anything that will tell us who is in charge of the different aspects of Lugnet, and what they can do? I know Todd has been looking to delegate some duties here, and I have no idea if he has or has not, and if he has then to (...) (22 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Changing Email Addresses
|
|
(...) Hey Kevin, Thanks for the note--and no, I hadn't tried that, because of precisely what you mentioned. I had expected that there would be another way to do it but apparently there isn't! I must think over this. best LFB (22 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) I think it would be instructive for you and everyone else that is concerned about this matter (all 3 of you :-) ) to review Todd's original (URL) post> especially the last sentence: "However, in the process I expect you in turn to respect the (...) (22 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) wisdom? (...) You know, I've been wondering the same thing for about 2 weeks now. He must be on Ridilin or something... I have never seen such straight, to the point, and tactful posts from him before! I had always assumed he was one of the (...) (22 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) Hear Hear! Dave K -'Tis amazing, inn't it that Scott has become the voice of rationale and wisdom? :) (22 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
I'm disappointed that MC's constructive post has been used as and excuse for axe grinding by the usual suspects. Scott A (22 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) Why must the painfully obvious constantly be pointed out to you? A. Because this is the only newsgroup I can currently reply to. B. Because it *IS* an administrative matter. But while we are here... Why the devil does it matter to you or Lar? (...) (22 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Marchetti wrote: (snip) (...) "Letter of the TOS"? Really. Tell me how exactly your post is anywhere near on topic for .admin. Grow up. JOHN (22 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) I completely agree he was rabble rousing and fully aware of it. Also arguably as egregious with its "in your face" attitude was his flaunting the fact that he was posting with a dead email address and not providing a good one. But I saw no (...) (22 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) That's pretty funny coming from you, Lar. You are absolutely the biggest baby in this sandbox and I think everyone knows that fact -- you have stated as much to me via private emails in the past. Sadly, neither this site nor real life is a (...) (22 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) I would vigorously dispute that. In fact I already have, and the person I disputed them with was satisfied that what I was getting at was that Richard acknowledge that he erred, acknowledge that he doesn't get a pass because he's an Angry (...) (22 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) Hop Frog cannot answer you because he has been banned. BTW, about the ban... what I would have suggested is a blanket ban with a definite time frame. He obviously posted knowing full well he was in violation of the TOS so a ban is in order. (...) (22 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Changing Email Addresses
|
|
Mr L F Braun wrote in message ... (...) Lindsay, you may already have done this, but I think you need to change it on this page: (URL) done, LUGNET should send you confirmation message that it has made the change, but when I did this a few weeks ago (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Changing Email Addresses
|
|
Hi Todd (and others!) I'm having a bit of trouble making a change to the email address that shows up in postings--the email appearing now is totally spammed to heck and also may be wiped out at any time by Michigan State. I changed it in my (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: FA: eBay - Minifigs, mostly Castle (follow up on weirdness)
|
|
I got this too.... and a reminder 24 hours later.... I just assumed it was e-mail harvesting. ;) (...) Good idea. Scott A Have you had a look at Arthurs Seat Yet? (2 URLs) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: FA: eBay - Minifigs, mostly Castle (follow up on weirdness)
|
|
In lugnet.market.auction, Alan Findlay wrote: ... (...) ... There's several services now in effect that block e-mail that is computer generated (aka spam) as opposed to human generated. The way these services work is they reply to all incoming (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Request group for new LEGO train club
|
|
Hi, I'd like to request a new group under trains.org for a new LEGO train club, M>ltc. I don't know if it's possible to use special characters in group names, if not, please just name it Mltc (note only the M is capitalised). This is for the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | password reset please
|
|
Member ID is #186, please reset my password and send email to me at ulringmc@columbus.rr.com thanks, mcu (22 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Authentication Not Being Sent To Inbox
|
|
I've tried six times now, but anytime I try to post in lugnet.space the "Message Awaiting Authentication" message never reaches my inbox. If I post to any other newsgroup it works! I can't figure it out. I haven't been using LUGNET for a while, did (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Password reset
|
|
(...) Me too! Member #1130 (22 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Museum
|
|
(...) If you'd like an article that you authored cancelled and you are unable to do it yourself because it was web or mail posted, or for whatever other reason, send a note requesting the cancel to the LUGNET admins, or to Frank Filz, or to myself (...) (22 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Password reset
|
|
Well, it seems I must also join the throng of users who need passwords set. I enrolled and got a member ID, 2013, but was never given the chance to establish a password during enrollment. Further, I never recieved any info in the two communications (...) (22 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: RTL query
|
|
(...) By my calculation, it's been a wasteland since November 12, 1999. Not coincidentally, LUGNET really started shaping up around November 5, 1999. I wonder if there's a connection... Dave! FUT OT.fun because I'm kind of just goofing off (22 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: RTL query
|
|
(...) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but I suspect RTL is more of a "wasteland" now than it ever was, at least in my view, based on my (and I suspect a lot of other people's views as well). (I say suspect because I haven't carried out an (...) (22 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
I'm going to answer to some of the things that were raised by others over the weekend... On Todd's banning me from Lugnet: Todd has not contacted me privately, indeed he is unable to do so because I'm not going to publish new contact information (...) (22 years ago, 25-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
(...) It's a cookie thing, I think. If you are required to check the TOS every time posting as a member, or required to enter your posting info every time, try resumbitting your posting set up while logged in as a member. James (22 years ago, 23-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Chris Phillips wrote: signed in as a member, you explictly check once in a blue moon) (...) I don't *think* I do, but maybe there are some differences, I'll have to ask Todd. (...) That's really strange because I'm not (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
(...) Maybe you use a different web interface than the rest of us do, but I am always signed in as a member, and my posts are not accepted unless I check the box on every post. Your other points are well taken. It seemed from your earlier post that (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
(...) You don't get a pass because you're an "angry young man"... (...) No, I'm telling him to abide by the ToS, and explicitly acknowledge that it applies to him and acknowledge that he erred and wronged EVERYONE, not just Todd, and make up for it (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
(...) Although I think Richard let his anger get the best of him when he made the post in question, I think some of these demands are a bit unreasonable. If he were required to do all these things, you might as well just censor his post because you (...) (22 years ago, 22-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:HopMIA.1JF5@lugnet.com... (...) The ToS (...) so I (...) I must confess that I rarely read the parts of ToS that contains rules that apply to conduct and behaviuor (Part 5) as I (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
(...) This was exactly my thought. Further, Todd has already established that he is extremely tolerant of disagreements and does not like to police them, I've seen far worse than Jon's message in the past, and as John Neal points out, Richard has (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
(...) The same goes for Jon. Scott A Have you had a look at Arthurs Seat Yet? (2 URLs) (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
(...) Indeed. But one can be both truthful and abusive…. perhaps “tact” & good manners should be a posting requirement? ;) More generally, people who are castigating Richard for breaking the TOS and/or being offensive should think carefully about (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
(...) From the ToS (discussion group section): 5. (do not) Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, or indecent information of any kind, including without limitation any (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:HopF1M.7y8@lugnet.com... Snip (...) neat (...) just (...) it (...) the (...) Well.. I have no interests in either way of WHO is getting banned and WHY.. or not... but if something is (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Request for password reset
|
|
I need a password reset. My member number is 1130. Jonathan Nichol (22 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
(...) I saw it... I saw the whole thread. When I read Jon's post I thought... "hmm.. Jon's stated what many of us know to be true and put it into one neat package... that's not going to be received well by Richard but I expect just about everyone (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
(...) Seriously? Jon wasn't even addressing RM! Any equivocation between these two is the farce! JOHN (22 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
Is Jon going to be banished too, even if not for as long a period? If not, then banishing Richard is a farce. Jon violated ToU also. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home (22 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
(...) Okay. I apologize to you, Todd -- because there may be an aspect to this that is like my being rude to someone else in your home, and for that I am sorry. I don't apologize to anyone else, and I specifically do not ask that the offending post (...) (22 years ago, 20-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Seriously...
|
|
Richard, Until further notice, your posting privileges on LUGNET are limited to the .admin.general group. As I'm sure you are aware, what you posted on the other thread was a clear violation of LUGNET's discussion group ToS. Your opinions about Jon (...) (22 years ago, 20-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New colors and other info
|
|
(...) Also; can we have a "bad word" filter or block? Scott A Have you had a look at Arthurs Seat Yet? (2 URLs) (22 years ago, 19-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New colors and other info
|
|
In lugnet.general, Richard Marchetti wrote: (snip) Richard should request that this post be cancelled, as it is clearly an egregious violation of the ToS. I would ask that everyone try to exercise restraint in this discussion. Let's not fan the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: THANK YOU!!!...!!!
|
|
(...) It would take a *very* large script to replace ME! Just ask me, I'll tell you. (22 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: password reset request
|
|
I also need a password reset. My member number is 1130. Jonathan Nichol (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: THANK YOU!!!...!!!
|
|
(...) Hush now or Todd will have you replaced with a very small script! :-) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: THANK YOU!!!...!!!
|
|
(...) Maybe you need a script to watch the script (that watches the script. :-) ) (22 years ago, 10-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: THANK YOU!!!...!!!
|
|
(...) Me too... I'm not 100% sure what happened, but basically the auto-restart script that monitors the NNTP server failed to restart it correctly after it fell down for some reason. I killed a hung process this morning and it restarted fine. Very (...) (22 years ago, 10-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: THANK YOU!!!...!!!
|
|
(...) What happened? I admit it was rather shocking to open up my email this morning and only get four emails, instead of the usual 50 Monday fare. I noticed that I couldn't reply to LUGNET stuff either. ~Mike (22 years ago, 10-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | THANK YOU!!!...!!!
|
|
I was going through Lugnet withdrawals all weekend!!!!!!! Yay!!! It works again!!!...!!! Rob (22 years ago, 10-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lost Passwords and the frustration that it brings...
|
|
(...) You don't need to be logged in to be able to post, because non members can post. You just have to re-execute email validation/setup(1). Of course, not being logged in means you get the validation email sent to you for each post you make. Hope (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Lost Passwords and the frustration that it brings...
|
|
(...) Well his support to members is appalling... Not even a response. Nothing. You've met my wife, she's not someone to vex. She just wants to post and update her profile! Most frustrating... TFM (22 years ago, 7-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: DCC reversing loops
|
|
(...) 404s are so unfriendly! Even a generic custom 404 page saying to try replacing (URL) with (URL) might be good... you're already returning a custom 404 as it is, it's all fancy and purple and stuff. (...) Did. (I realise you're not just talking (...) (22 years ago, 6-Nov-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: set guide error message
|
|
(...) I just got another one of these. This time on set 1374. An internal server error occurred: Died at /usr/home/lugnet/pdb2/pdb_m2.pm line 110. Ray (22 years ago, 2-Nov-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Problem with authentication e-mails
|
|
Hello, I have recently tried to make a couple of posts, but I have not gotten the authentication e-mail for either of them. Is there any way for you to check to see if authentication e-mails have been sent, to see if the problem is on your end or on (...) (22 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | membership
|
|
its been 2 months to the day since i made a donation towords membership, and was wondering if there might be any news as to when the next group was being added. thanks in advance -travis kunce (22 years ago, 29-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | password reset request
|
|
Hi, can you reset my password please? I think I never received it.. my lugnet id 2114. thanks, JC (22 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Happy 5th Lugnet!!!
|
|
(...) All together now: For it's a YELLOW good fellow...! (22 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Happy 5th Lugnet!!!
|
|
(...) For it's a jelly good fellow... yay! (...) Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) (remove SPAM when e-mailing) (22 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Happy 5th Lugnet!!!
|
|
Wow! I forgot to post the other day, but Lugnet just passed it's 5 year anniversary :) Way to go! Read a little about the history here: (URL) (22 years ago, 14-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with "lugnet.announce.bricklink"
|
|
(...) [ghit-àpp-aa!] <galliard@shades-of-night.com> ha scritto nel messaggio news:HM93KM.1Lo1@lugnet.com... scusate, sono proprio stupidino.... (22 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.loc.it, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lost passwords?
|
|
(...) Can we PLEASE get this dealt with, this is going on at least 8 months now since the password was lost! Dean (22 years ago, 12-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: European LUG MAP (2)
|
|
(...) Agreed! Thanks guys! (...) Let's not be hasty. I'm not 100% sure this was all Todd doing it, I think he had some help too. The (URL) page is not done with FTX so it's not just a matter of creating a curator for the area, there may be a bit (...) (22 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.loc.be, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | set guide error message
|
|
When trying to pull up the Set Guide entry for 7104, I got this error... (...) It was embedded in the header of the set guide for 7104 (the guide entry actually displayed). None of the usual statistical information showed up at the bottom of the (...) (22 years ago, 8-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: admin change
|
|
(...) No, I was referring to the number of images on a served page, and the byte count generated by an average BZPower page load, in comparison to pages on Lugnet which on average have far fewer individual graphics. The requirements from Kevin are (...) (22 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: admin change
|
|
(...) Hmmm. I think maybe you're underestimating the intensity of Lugnet. (22 years ago, 5-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with "lugnet.announce.bricklink"
|
|
(...) I think you're right, James. I belived this newsgroup was made for all people who owned a store on BrickLink, but there is only one post (of Dan Jezek)... I didn't saw it before... Thank you very much! Luca (22 years ago, 4-Oct-03, to lugnet.loc.it, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with "lugnet.announce.bricklink"
|
|
(...) I believe it is because the announce.bricklink group is only for posting official announcements from Bricklink itself, so posting has been restricted to people who represent Bricklink; currently only Dan Jezek, unless I'm mistaken. hope that (...) (22 years ago, 4-Oct-03, to lugnet.loc.it, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Problems with "lugnet.announce.bricklink"
|
|
(...) WHY??? (...) Ok, see what's going wrong... (...) Yes! (...) Yes! I received it! (...) Sure! Can someone say me why do I receive such answer, when I try to post a message in those forum?? Hope someone can help me! Best regards, Luca Giannitti (22 years ago, 4-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: admin change
|
|
(...) We had this issue at BZPower and finally found a decent roost through a reseller named Easy Host Solutions. BZP has a dedicated Linux server which is just about keeping up (although the site is graphically much more intense than Lugnet, so (...) (22 years ago, 3-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Password reset request (Getting bored of this yet :-)
|
|
Todd, Gad to see that you're getting more publicly involved again! By the way, I use (URL) for my site and they are very reasonable and reliable. Also (URL) has a great reputation but they are a bit pricey. Anyways, I'm member #715 and I have only (...) (22 years ago, 3-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: admin change
|
|
(...) (or more, as you choose and as you feel you've used up more bandwidth) (...) I'd argue that LUGNET is profoundly commercial, in that it was intended to be a livelihood at one point. (22 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: admin change
|
|
(...) Well, I certainly do forget a lot. (22 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: admin change
|
|
(...) For only $50/month you can have a colo box at (URL) but it wouldn't be able to be used for commercial endeavors. Since I think the only commercial aspect to Lugnet is the Amazon and similar links, that is probably OK. They also do hosting on (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: admin change
|
|
(...) I would like to also give a big thank you to Suz for the great support she has been to us, and for co-creating LUGNet. I know I have been mostly in the Lurker status for the past 8 months, but I have still enjoyed what LUGNet has to offer, and (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: admin change
|
|
<<snip>> (...) I can do this on GMT-time if the requests are posted to either a SPAM-free e-mail adress (yeah, right) or a newsgroup (don't know how this works since I have not needed it myself - *knock on wood*). <<snip>> (...) I'm afraid that (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: admin change
|
|
<<snipp> (...) Indeed. And that I have become. I have updated the subpages of CLSotW and awaits: (...) ...but as I have said before and still claim, there is no rush Todd! Do it when you have time, don't do Lugnet work on NWBrickCon unless you feel (...) (22 years ago, 1-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: admin change
|
|
Two things. First, a huge thank you to Suzanne for all the work you have done on this site. Along with a very small number of sites (Brickshelf in particular) Lugnet has helped turn us all from individual hobbyists into a true community. So we all (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: admin change
|
|
(...) Thanks, Lar. [blushing] If my work can be called remarkable, yours is downright stupefying! (...) Indeed! After two years of storage, my LEGO, DUPLO, DACTA, and Belville are finally coming out. It all looks so yummie! There are some very cool (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: admin change
|
|
(...) Suz, your absence in the admin end of things here will be sorely missed! Your contributions to LUGNET (and to the overall growth of the hobby over the years) have been nothing short of truly remarkable. But one kind of loss is sometimes (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: admin change
|
|
[oops, reposting -- I accidentally posted the first reply in lugnet.general] A quick follow-up and then I have to go pack for NWBrickCon. I love this role -- but it's very time-consuming. Consequently, whenever I've walked in these shoes in the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-03, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | admin change
|
|
Hi All! As I mentioned at BrickFest in August, I'm retiring from my position as a LUGNET administrator. I'll still be around as an AFOL, but am not receiving LUGNET's admin e-mail. Please direct questions to Todd. thanks, Suz (22 years ago, 30-Sep-03, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | visit the new populair lego website
|
|
visit the new populair lego website || ||(URL) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: News/Discussion Group Traffic (Sun 28 Sep 2003)
|
|
(...) These are the lowest numbers I can recall seeing in a very very long time. It seems clear to me that things still are awry. (22 years ago, 28-Sep-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Password Reset Request
|
|
Hi Todd - I have another password reset request, this one's been waiting several months. Tom Dickson - LUGNET #1966 Thanks!! -Tim (22 years ago, 28-Sep-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: How to change what the news server thinks my email is?
|
|
(...) me a statement to the effect that the form was not filled in properly when I know it, in fact, has been filled in correctly. It further tells me to go back a page and to keep resubmitting. Obviously, you have many things on your plate at the (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-03, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
