| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
| |
From the ToS (discussion group section):
5. (do not) Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous,
defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, or indecent information
of any kind, including without limitation any transmissions constituting or
encouraging conduct that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise to
civil liability, or otherwise violate any local, state, national, or
international law.
So yes, whether something is true or not does matter (“libelous” is one of
the banned posting types) in evaluating whether it abides by clause 5.
|
Indeed. But one can be both truthful and abusive…. perhaps “tact” & good
manners should be a posting requirement? ;)
More generally, people who are castigating Richard for breaking the TOS
and/or being offensive should think carefully about their posting record.
I doubt this place would improve if Richard were to leave.
|
The same goes for Jon.
Scott A
Have you had a look at Arthurs Seat Yet?
 
| |
Scott A
(Who is not convinced this thread belongs in either of these groups)
Have you had a look at Arthurs Seat Yet?
|
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Seriously...
|
| (...) Indeed. But one can be both truthful and abusive…. perhaps “tact” & good manners should be a posting requirement? ;) More generally, people who are castigating Richard for breaking the TOS and/or being offensive should think carefully about (...) (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
