Subject:
|
Re: Seriously...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:44:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
358 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
| |
The only issue for me was the ‘colourful language’.
|
Of course! What else are we talking about????
JOHN
|
“
Nothing to follow. Jon expressed an opinion, and a rather benign one at that. Is
this grounds for banishment? And even if insulting is grounds for banishment, I
personally have endured countless personal attacks at the hands of RM; far worse
than this! RM’s leash is far and away longer than anyone else’s on LUGNET, and
his latest attack on Jon is IMO the lowest point to which LUGNET has ever
descended. His disdain for everything this community stands for is contemptible.
”
No mention of the colourful language, but the ‘disdain for everything this
community stands for’, directed as a blanket statement to Richard’s postings in
general.
‘RM’s leash’--up till this point, RM has had the same ‘leash’ as everyone else.
There was no usage of foul language up ‘till this point, and he got ‘reeled in’
for the usage.
Anyway, just clarifying.
Dave K
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Seriously...
|
| (...) What I was responding to there was Tom's assertion that Jon be suspended as well. I questioned whether insults were really grounds for reprimand for if they were, RM has been guilty numerous times in the past without consequence (long leash). (...) (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
