Subject:
|
Re: Seriously...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:15:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
214 times
|
| |
|
|
You must have skipped the post I saw...
He may have been ADDRESSING someone else, but he was insulting Richard.
Perhaps you need to follow the thread again.
John wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Thomas Stangl wrote:
> > Is Jon going to be banished too, even if not for as long a period?
> >
> > If not, then banishing Richard is a farce. Jon violated ToU also.
>
> Seriously? Jon wasn't even {addressing} RM! Any equivocation between these two
> is the farce!
>
> [JOHN]
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Seriously...
|
| (...) Nothing to follow. Jon expressed an opinion, and a rather benign one at that. Is this grounds for banishment? And even if insulting is grounds for banishment, I personally have endured countless personal attacks at the hands of RM; far worse (...) (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | Re: Seriously...
|
| (...) I saw it... I saw the whole thread. When I read Jon's post I thought... "hmm.. Jon's stated what many of us know to be true and put it into one neat package... that's not going to be received well by Richard but I expect just about everyone (...) (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
