| |
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:HopF1M.7y8@lugnet.com...
Snip
> I saw it... I saw the whole thread. When I read Jon's post I thought...
>
> "hmm.. Jon's stated what many of us know to be true and put it into one • neat
> package... that's not going to be received well by Richard but I expect • just
> about everyone else to nod their heads in agreement".(1)
>
> It wasn't exactly an example of an all sweetness and light post, because • it
> pointed out unpleasant truths about Richard, but it was in my view within • the
> bounds of the ToS.
Well.. I have no interests in either way of WHO is getting banned and WHY..
or not... but if something is true or not, regarding someone should not be
an issue of someone is getting banned or not.
Can someone get banned for beeing a jerk or being negative? (for bad
language, YES, no question about that..)
(I read your (#1) but I need a clarification on it)
Regards
/Joakim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Seriously...
|
| (...) From the ToS (discussion group section): 5. (do not) Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, or indecent information of any kind, including without limitation any (...) (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Seriously...
|
| (...) I saw it... I saw the whole thread. When I read Jon's post I thought... "hmm.. Jon's stated what many of us know to be true and put it into one neat package... that's not going to be received well by Richard but I expect just about everyone (...) (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
