Subject:
|
Re: admin change
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:43:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
287 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman wrote:
> [1] If you have any suggestions regarding high-bandwidth, high-availability
> Linux server hosting solutions, by all means please let me know. Basic
> minimum requirements would be a 1GHz PIII or equivalent, 512MB RAM, a 30GB
> hard drive, and 100 GB/month outgoing bandwidth. Budget is ~$200/month,
> with some fudge. We had been considering ServerBeach for a while until we
> learned of several substantiated reports this summer of SB catoring to
> spammers.
For only $50/month you can have a colo box at http://www.communitycolo.net/ but
it wouldn't be able to be used for commercial endeavors. Since I think the only
commercial aspect to Lugnet is the Amazon and similar links, that is probably
OK. They also do hosting on their own boxes as well.
www.baylug.org and a bunch of other organizations I belong to share a box at
communitycolor already, and it works well. They use Hurricane Electric as the
provider and the uptime has been excellent.
--Bill.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: admin change
|
| (...) (or more, as you choose and as you feel you've used up more bandwidth) (...) I'd argue that LUGNET is profoundly commercial, in that it was intended to be a livelihood at one point. (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: admin change
|
| [oops, reposting -- I accidentally posted the first reply in lugnet.general] A quick follow-up and then I have to go pack for NWBrickCon. I love this role -- but it's very time-consuming. Consequently, whenever I've walked in these shoes in the (...) (21 years ago, 30-Sep-03, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
