Subject:
|
Re: admin change
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 04:46:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
857 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Kelly McKiernan <kelly@anagrafyxx.com> wrote:
> > named Easy Host Solutions. BZP has a dedicated Linux server which is
> > just about keeping up (although the site is graphically much more
> > intense than Lugnet, so peak times do see some "Server Too Busy"
> > messages), and it's in the price range you're looking at. Uptime has
>
> Hmmm. I think maybe you're underestimating the intensity of Lugnet.
No, I was referring to the number of images on a served page, and the byte count
generated by an average BZPower page load, in comparison to pages on Lugnet
which on average have far fewer individual graphics.
The requirements from Kevin are well within the levels for a hosting service
that may serve this site's needs:
> [1] If you have any suggestions regarding high-bandwidth, high-availability
> Linux server hosting solutions, by all means please let me know. Basic
> minimum requirements would be a 1GHz PIII or equivalent, 512MB RAM, a 30GB
> hard drive, and 100 GB/month outgoing bandwidth. Budget is ~$200/month,
> with some fudge.
More specifically, BZP pays a bit more than the above per month for a 1.7GHz P4
running Linux with 2GB RAM and 500GB transfer limit per month. We only actually
use half the allotted bandwidth. Of course I don't know Lugnet's page loads or
monthly hits, but since BZP's 66 million hits/mo. and 250GB/mo. transfer fits
into that hosting plan, I would think Lugnet's 100GB/mo. transfer would as well.
Hopefully this info can help you with your decisions on future hosting options.
Good luck with whatever you decide.
Regards,
Kelly
BZPower
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
