In lugnet.faq, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.faq, Don Heyse wrote:
> > In lugnet.faq, Neb Okla wrote:
> > >
> > > "Thomas Main" <thomasmain@myrealbox.com> wrote
> > > > continuing to this day (it is true that the advent of LUGNET
> > > > drastically cut the number of quality discussions about Lego there,
> > > > however).
> > >
> > > It may have cut the number of total discussions, but your personal
> > > judgement of "quality" can hardly be considered a "truth".
>
> Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but I suspect RTL is more of a "wasteland"
> now than it ever was, at least in my view, based on my (and I suspect a lot of
> other people's views as well).
By my calculation, it's been a wasteland since November 12, 1999.
Not coincidentally, LUGNET really started shaping up around November 5, 1999.
I wonder if there's a connection...
Dave!
FUT OT.fun because I'm kind of just goofing off
|
