Subject:
|
Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:07:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4992 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Mark Riley wrote:
> In lugnet.lego, Anne Carasik wrote:
> > This one time, Greg Muri wrote:
> > > Hi Anne, glad there are people out there who feel the same way I do and are
> > > not afraid to say so.
> >
> > Why should I be? I give them money. Since I have a choice on what I pay
> > for, I have a right to open my big mouth and say something :)
>
> I think what Greg might have been referring to is the disparaging remarks from
> some other folks here (who aren't bothered by the color issue) who find it
> necessary to characterize those who feel otherwise as "whiners" or
> "complainers".
>
> FWIW, the light gray change doesn't bother me so much as the dark gray. If the
> old dark gray had to change to remove the yellowish tint, then at least replace
> it with a truly neutral dark gray, not this blue tinted gun metal version. All
> this talk of a crisper pallette sorta reminds me of the way Sony pumped up the
> color saturation on many of their digicams because reality just wasn't good
> enough...
>
> Mark
I don't mind new colors in new sets. But I do dislike what the changes mean for
reissues of old sets. I was looking forward to reissues of sets like 6080 down
the line. But even if that happens, it will look less like a light gray
building and more like a dark white one.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The sky is *not* falling
|
| (...) I think what Greg might have been referring to is the disparaging remarks from some other folks here (who aren't bothered by the color issue) who find it necessary to characterize those who feel otherwise as "whiners" or "complainers". FWIW, (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jan-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
56 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
