Subject:
|
Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:32:07 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
rob.antonishen@gmailIHATESPAM.com
|
Viewed:
|
713 times
|
| |
|
|
On 9/20/05, David Koudys wrote:
> The ability to, after you're facing that 'bot, to find the proper 'face' to
> make
> the deposit--there's the rub...
Though it would make sense that (assuming most bots don't have an
omni-drive) if you get bumped , it would be by the front of another
bot... so the question is, on what face is your depositor and on what
face is your receiver?
If they are both on the same save, I can see it getting messy.
If they are on opposite faces, then there are two possible behaviours:
1) your bot could "offer up" it's receiver to the side it was bumped. (passive)
2) your bot could turn its depositor to try and deposit in the
direction it was bumped. (aggressive)
But a passive/passive meeting, or aggressive/aggressive meeting would
go nowhere...
-Rob A>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, rob.antonishen@gmail.com wrote: <snip> (...) A circumference of bumpers around the perimeter--that should be easy for Chris who has the cybermaster touch switches to differentiate on one port which bumper was pressed (I (...) (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
