Subject:
|
Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:06:54 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
[rob.antonishen@gmail.]stopspammers[com]
|
Viewed:
|
675 times
|
| |
|
|
On 9/20/05, Chris Magno wrote:
>
> if i were to do BoP again, i would not allow the tower bots. and add a
> size rule.
SO just say "at no time must an entry intentionally contact the ground."
-Rob A>
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) no, thats different. a size rule, still allows you to EXPAND a tower, if you were that clever. a no touch the ground rule, would disqualify any bot that broke, or had parts brake off. but this game is the past. lets move forward to scoring. (...) (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) I was swayed by Calums arguement at dinner-- if the rules for BoP were changed to-- your 'bot must fit within the end of the beam and the 1 foot mark, as well as be under 2 feet 'tall' at hte start of the match. This would not preclude the (...) (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) my idea is that a BOX is a VERY good strategy, ESPECIALLY if I were to have KATE and Abby, and ROB each enter one. A Magno would be sure to score then. a play field of box's is not a game i want to play. if i were to do BoP again, i would not (...) (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
