Subject:
|
Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 15:14:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
600 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, September 20, 2005 10:01 am, Rob Antonishen wrote:
>
> On 9/20/05, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> >
> > Here's my suggestion: leave the top of the input open. If someone wants to
> > enter a
> > box into a robot competition, go for it. Then, the goal is to build a fully
> > autonomous robot that out preforms a box.
> >
> > Steve
>
>
> Like that. I'd even go so far as to say the playfield should come
> with 1 box sitting somewhere in the middle to act as a "control" that
> performance can be measured against.
>
> -Rob A>
Maybe Jennifer & Janey could enter it (official "J"Lug entry?). I'm sure it will
outscore Chris.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug wrote: <snip> (...) It's great that rtlToronto gets a wide variety of people building for their competitions, from kids to women to PHD's... Here's my take on the orifice issue--it would be next to (...) (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) Like that. I'd even go so far as to say the playfield should come with 1 box sitting somewhere in the middle to act as a "control" that performance can be measured against. -Rob A> (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
