Subject:
|
Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:23:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
533 times
|
| |
|
|
David Koudys wrote:
> http://sparky.i989.net/blog/00000272.php
>
> In which I have a few pics and some ideas about the event...
>
> Have a boo!
>
> Dave K
ineresting....
but i had a closed design in mind.
as steve has said, this open top hopper makes it too easy to plant a box
and walk away.
so your standard repitcle. should be a X by X hole in a wall, vs an open
top box.
i think a hole in the wall recpticle makes for a MUCH tougher game; and
disallows the box soloution.
comments??
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) Interesting, I guess this is what you were trying to get at at dinner about a standardized interface. Your right this makes it much more challenging, and interesting. Although it nullifies one of my ideas. Which is fine, just less explosive. (...) (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
