Subject:
|
Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 23:55:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
730 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ed Jones writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> > That said, how do the links provided connect to the current debate?
>
> They're in this thread tree somewhere but I'll repeat them.
>
> http://www.reason.com/0004/fe.rl.show.html shows a general view of
> agenda-ism... (nice coinage James)
>
> http://www.reason.com/0004/fe.cf.secrets.html shows what poltroons the
> Clintonistas are.
>
> http://www.reason.com/0004/co.th.selected.html shows the mastery of the Big
> Lie.
>
> ++Lar
Larry, I read them.
While interesting reading, they suffer from everything that Scott has accused
me of: name calling, lack of evidence, etc.
The Mastery of the Big Lie was interesting in that it is an idea developed by
Roger Ailes for the Reagan/Bush Administrations. Forget the scandal, invent an
event. Forget my crime record, invent Willy Horton.
The biggest lie by any recent president, IMO, was Bush: I was head of the CIA
and knew nothing about Watergate. Wonderfuly followed by: I was Vice
President but knew nothing about Iran-Contra.
The point is, the only way to get to the whitehouse since Kennedy, is by
lieing, cheating and stealing. Its now a seemingly irreversable perpetuation.
All politician's are crooks. I pick mine by their crimes.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
74 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
