To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 5106
5105  |  5107
Subject: 
Re: Wench as a word
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 02:56:08 GMT
Viewed: 
666 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Edward Sanburn writes:

and unpaid
taxes, where is your proof that Hilary Clinton is a "Marxist Wench"?

Well, what would you consider her attempt to socialize healthcare in
1993? A nice gesture by an unelected person? I would suggest you start
here, which is a good example of here Marxist / leftist tendencies, and
elitist attitude, which is a good clue of here as a Marxist:

http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory032100.html

According to the strict definition of the word, Nazi is very appropriate for
the Clintons and liberals of their bent. It involves a totalitarian control of
industry and the economy, and is similar to Fascism - both of which (Nazi and
Fascist) are constantly incorrectly directed at Republicans.

Here are the definitions:

Nazi:  the body of political and economic doctrines held and put into effect by
the National Socialist German Workers' party in the Third German Reich
including the totalitarian principle of government, state control of all
industry, predominance of groups assumed to be racially superior, and supremacy
of the führer.

First off, Slick Willy (a name which was coined by his friends and which he
likes) with all of his Executive Orders is more like the fuhrer than any
president in history. No other president has ever ruled so consistently
against the will of the people than this guy. Many of his Orders are also
unconstitutional.


Totalitarian: of or relating to a political regime based on subordination of
the individual to the state and strict control of all aspects of the life and
productive capacity of the nation especially by coercive measures (as
censorship and terrorism)

"Subordination...to the state and strict control of all aspects of life and
productivity" - tobacco lawsuits, gun manufacterer lawsuits, next is junk food!
This is gov't trying to control industry. There are other examples which I
can't recall right now. It is liberals who control our lives and productivity
with tax policies. It is proven that lower taxes increases the amount of money
that the fed gets - yet liberals always raise taxes. It is clear that it is not
to get more money, otherwise they would lower them. They do it to gain control
over our lives and make us more dependant on them. How 'bout labor unions for
an example of socialist totalitarianism, and attached at the hip to the mob,
too! Unions are against capitalism and do nothing but raise prices. And talk
about coercion - just today a goverment lawyer threatened gun makers with
bankruptcy. That's what these lawsuits are designed for - intimidation and
coercion. The gov't has no constitutional right to sue legitimate businesses
which they (the gov't) license in the first place. This is fascism and nazism.
Giulianni has done none of these things - he has made NY safer. And all this
political correctness pap is nothing but censorship of non-liberal causes.


Fascism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti)
that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a
centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe
economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.

It is liberals who attempt to silence all opposition. They do not want informed
people to have freedom of "choice" on anything, and the abortion issue is
evidence of that - they're not pro-choice they're pro-abortion and against
women making any other "choice".

And one theme that is in all three that I haven't addressed yet is racism.
Liberals always call conservatives racists, yet it is liberals who are truly
racists. Democrats voted against civil rights - it was Republicans who voted
for civil rights. The founder of Planned Parenthood is an admitted racist and
has admitted that abortion is directed at minorities - she even said that the
unborn children who have been killed have contributed to lowering crime rates
because they were mostly poor minorities who would have grown up to become
criminals antway (so much for innocent until proven guilty - these babies were
condemned to the death penalty before breathing their first breath!) It is
liberals who constantly see people as a part of a minority group instead of as
citizens or Americans only. Minorities have been led by liberals for forty
years and have gotten nothing except dependancy on welfare crumbs. They are
constantly told that they can't make it without liberal's help! This is
insulting! Yes, there is racism in America, but there is racism everywhere.
There is racism amongst black people - africans against islanders; racism
amongst spanish people - cubans against puerto ricans etc. But it is liberals
who capitalize on the preservation of racism. And, just for the record, I'm in
an inter-racial marriage and have had to deal with racism against my wife and
children first hand.

If anyone is a nazi or fascist it is liberals! So, yes, nazi, marxist and
fascist all fit Bill and Hillary.

Bill



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Wench as a word
 
Ed, (...) So, he gets acquitted in a criminal case, and somehow, in civil court, he owes 100,000 to the US tax court for taking bribes? That is what is fishy, Ed. Maybe your reading on it seems a little strange, hence, fishy. Why isn't the IRS after (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

74 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR