Subject:
|
Re: Wench as a word
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:44:15 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
sgore@superonline.com*stopspammers*
|
Viewed:
|
694 times
|
| |
|
|
"Scott E. Sanburn" wrote:
>
> Well, calling a person a Nazi because you disagree with him is not
> debatable, Ed. That is a waste of time, IMHO. If you don't like
> Gulliani, fine. Calling people names and providing disgusts about shirts
> seem a funny road to go down, however. Coping out involves dubious
> points, like most of what you put here. Talk to Larry if you feel
> compelled enough about it.
I agree on this. It's just as strange as calling anyone you don't like
as "leftist" or "marksist" or whatever...:-)
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Yet it is easy to demonstrate that liberals are leftist and marxist, while the label of nazi is not at all applicable to Giulliani. Applying the label correctly is not hyperboly. Applying a label incorrectly, when it doesn't remotely ressemble (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Selçuk, (...) Well, sir, when you exhibit classical signs of leftism, I will cal you a leftist. IF you don't like Gulliani, fine, but calling him a Nazi is typical liberal / Democratic rhetoric. If a call Al Sharpton a racist, then I am at fault, (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Ed, (...) Well, Ed, since i don't know the particulars on this one, why don't you inform us of it? I do remember something along the lines of congress people now being under the same laws oas we, the citizens, are. If he did not pay his taxes, he (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
