Subject:
|
Re: Wench as a word
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 02:40:27 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lar@voyager.net/StopSpammers/
|
Viewed:
|
567 times
|
| |
|
|
ed jones wrote:
> Considering that the Civil Court decision was in 1984, and that there is no
> appeal on file, and the statute of limitations has run out. Owning back taxes
> and then not paying the back taxes owed is not paying taxes.
OK. That's the first I heard about the 1984 part, but I wasn't reading
that closely, I had a project plan to tweak.
But what are we debating here, anyway? The subject doesn't seem to match
the words.
Traficant is a garden variety pol. Scott likes him, that's great. I've
read, and been amused, by some of his speeches, he's right about how
laughable some government proposals are. Just because he's right about
those proposals doesn't score any points with me, he needs to have
actually done something about them. In the final analysis, based on 5
min of digging on my part, he may well be a grafter who's gotten away
with a lot of small time graft.
But so what? When we sort pols by evil, the minor grafters usually sort
to the middle at worst.
Hilary is about as scummy as they come because she's a major grafter and
bent on screwing up the country for no good reason at all. Peggy Noonan,
mouthpiece of the evil GOP that she might be, was spot on in that NR
piece. Everything HRC does is about HRC or about covering up what HRC
did in the past or positioning HRC for a power grab in the future.
Now, there are lots in the GOP AND the Dem party just like her, so Peggy
doesn't exactly have clean hands, she's written speeches for baddies
too.
Which is why the LP wants to reduce the scope of what power pols even
have. If you want to root out major evil you need to make it not even be
possible. I'd stand on our record at that when we've been in office, in
Alaska and NH state houses, we consistently tried to reduce the scope of
possible graft.
Again I'll ask, what is the topic? Wenches?
--
Larry Pieniazek - lpieniazek@mercator.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) to (...) aquittal, (...) Considering that the Civil Court decision was in 1984, and that there is no appeal on file, and the statute of limitations has run out. Owning back taxes and then not paying the back taxes owed is not paying taxes. (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
