Subject:
|
Re: Wench as a word
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Mar 2000 23:53:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
768 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Edward Sanburn writes:
> Ed,
>
> ed jones wrote:
> >
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Edward Sanburn writes:
> >
> > Proof would be
> > > nice in this instance, not some rant by you. Give me some url's, etc.
> >
> > http://www.friedly.com/jock/traficant011498.html
>
> Well, according to this article, his campaign seems to have taken 300.00
> from "TRAFICANT TOOK DONATION FROM WIFE OF INDICTED MOB FIGURE", or
> Gorgano Landscaping Company. Whether or not this company is dealing with
> the mob or not, it is still a legal contribution, unless I am reading
> something wrong here. As for the the bribes he took when he was a
> sheriff, he was acquitted in a criminal court case, but then the IRS
> says he owes taxes on 100,000 for bribes. Something is fishy here.
Yes, your reading is fishy. From the article:
"Although Traficant was acquitted in criminal court, he was less successful in
civil court. His latest financial disclosure form indicates that he still owes
more than $100,000 to the Internal Revenue Service after the U.S. Tax Court
ruled that he owed back taxes for taking bribes."
He was acquitted in criminal court, but was found guilty in Civil Court. The
Tax Court set the penalty, not the IRS.
> Well, as I have said numerous times, ad nuaseum, ad infinitium, if he
> broke the law, prosecute him. It seems to me your allegations still
> don't hold water very well, Ed. If there is a crime, have it
> investigated, or drop it.
When did you say that "ad nuaseum, ad infinitium", show me the posts?
And now that I have provided my proof of Trafficant's conviction and unpaid
taxes, where is your proof that Hilary Clinton is a "Marxist Wench"? Show me
some URLs.
As to Guillani, Brooklyn is filing criminal charges against both Guillani and
the NYPD over a series of police brutality/murder coverups.
> >
http://www.techserver.com/newsroom/ntn/info/020498/info13_26321_noframes.html
>
> Oh yes, he is definitely a criminal in this example. What are you saying
> here? He is extremely funny, if you see him on C-Span, he makes a lot of
> good points about how bad it is in Washington, and this example here
> about the v-chip is brilliant!
Not an example of his criminality, but of his character. Brilliant - its
totally tasteless. More of this kind of lockerroom humor can be found on his
website in his "1 minute speeches" given on the Senate floor (I don't have the
URL handy, but entering Trafficant in Yahoo will give you his website URL.)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Ed, (...) So, he gets acquitted in a criminal case, and somehow, in civil court, he owes 100,000 to the US tax court for taking bribes? That is what is fishy, Ed. Maybe your reading on it seems a little strange, hence, fishy. Why isn't the IRS after (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Ed, (...) from "TRAFICANT TOOK DONATION FROM WIFE OF INDICTED MOB FIGURE", or Gorgano Landscaping Company. Whether or not this company is dealing with the mob or not, it is still a legal contribution, unless I am reading something wrong here. As for (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
