Subject:
|
What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 03:52:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
608 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry,
I think it all started when, in the context of defining a wench, I
called Hillary a Marxist wench, and Ed, obviously a Hillary fan, got
disjointed and started laying out all this other stuff. I just just
Traficant as an example of me liking some Democrats, I saw some of his
speeches on various items, and I thought he brought up some good points.
I did not realize his "mob" ties, etc.
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> ed jones wrote:
>
> > Considering that the Civil Court decision was in 1984, and that there is no
> > appeal on file, and the statute of limitations has run out. Owning back taxes
> > and then not paying the back taxes owed is not paying taxes.
>
> OK. That's the first I heard about the 1984 part, but I wasn't reading
> that closely, I had a project plan to tweak.
>
> But what are we debating here, anyway? The subject doesn't seem to match
> the words.
I don't know myself, Ed hates Gulliani, and can't seem to grasp not
everyone worships Hillary, I guess.
> Traficant is a garden variety pol. Scott likes him, that's great.
I think he is funny, I don't know too much about him, but even for a
Democrat, I like some of what he says. Not all Democrats are bad, not
all Republicans are good.
I've
> read, and been amused, by some of his speeches, he's right about how
> laughable some government proposals are. Just because he's right about
> those proposals doesn't score any points with me, he needs to have
> actually done something about them. In the final analysis, based on 5
> min of digging on my part, he may well be a grafter who's gotten away
> with a lot of small time graft.
Indeed. I wonder if any people in the political realm, of any party,
don't have some graft somewhere anymore.
> But so what? When we sort pols by evil, the minor grafters usually sort
> to the middle at worst.
> Hilary is about as scummy as they come because she's a major grafter and
> bent on screwing up the country for no good reason at all. Peggy Noonan,
> mouthpiece of the evil GOP
Evil, evil, evil HA HA HA HA HA HA (Sorry, I had to say it!)
> that she might be, was spot on in that NR
> piece. Everything HRC does is about HRC or about covering up what HRC
> did in the past or positioning HRC for a power grab in the future.
> Now, there are lots in the GOP AND the Dem party just like her, so Peggy
> doesn't exactly have clean hands, she's written speeches for baddies
> too.
Yes, indeed. I was trying to find an article implying some of the
leftist tendencies of Hillary. I do it mostly by reading, not online.
> Which is why the LP wants to reduce the scope of what power pols even
> have. If you want to root out major evil you need to make it not even be
> possible. I'd stand on our record at that when we've been in office, in
> Alaska and NH state houses, we consistently tried to reduce the scope of
> possible graft.
Hmm...well, Larry, I am pessimistic by nature, and outside of a
revolution or some major epidemic upheaval in the US, I think we will
slip more into socialism. I really can't see most people accepting
Libertarian philosophy (which for the most part, I agree with, BTW),
mostly because of what the Republicans tried to do, and got tarred and
feathered by it. I think we might have to wait a generation or two until
the philosophies of most people can change. I think it is slowly
happening, but it will be awhile. Do you have a resource of what the LP
did in Alaska and NH? How many people were elected, what kind of things
did they propose, etc?
I remember a debate when I was going to Mott Community College regarding
health care benefits to some long term Medicare patients, the Democrat
sounded socialist (government should spend more, etc.), the Republican
tried to sound not mean (It was a tough crowd to campaign in), and the
Libertarian made me laugh. He said, well, the Libertarian Party doesn't
believe in Medicare (I don't remember for sure, so please excuse my lack
of memory), and the entire room was quiet except me. Like it was a total
shock anyone even suggested that.
> Again I'll ask, what is the topic? Wenches?
I hope I explained it a little better. I ruffled Ed's feathers,
suggested an obvious vile criminal, and did not show respect to goddess
Hillary. Oh well, enough playing around here. I have stuff to do!
Scott S.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net
Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> http://www.aeieng.com
LEGO Page -> http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/3372/legoindex.html
Home Page -> http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/3372/index.html
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) OK. That's the first I heard about the 1984 part, but I wasn't reading that closely, I had a project plan to tweak. But what are we debating here, anyway? The subject doesn't seem to match the words. Traficant is a garden variety pol. Scott (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
