| |
In lugnet.general, Ed Jones writes:
>
> Now I can fully see calling Rudy Guiliani a Nazi. His terms of office as mayor
> of NY is full of examples: the level of police brutality in his terms of
> office has skyrocketed; the verdict comes down claiming police officers who
> shot an innocent man 41 times were not guility, and then the police shoot
> another innocent man last week. Then Rudy has legally "sealed" files on last
> week's victim made public to justify the PD action?
I'd say that calling anyone a nazi is pretty strong language that should be used
with care and restraint. By calling someone a nazi, you are accusing them of
possessing the same moral character as a group that practiced the worst
systematic evil in human history. Even if Guliani were found to be guilty of
the things that you mention, I wouldn't call him a nazi. I'm sure that we could
find something appropriate to describe his actions, but to be a part of the most
wretched character class that has ever disgraced mankind is a charge that I
wouldn't be hasty leveling against him.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) always (...) to (...) [snip] (...) Re: Wench - the term was used to describe a serving woman in the middle ages. Not politically incorrect at that time. Now, it is a derogatory comment. In fact, it is a very useful derogatory comment. Vanna (...) (27 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
