Subject:
|
Re: This just came across my desk... Iraqi Questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 20:31:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
421 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > I'm having a bit of a problem with that assertion. Either the DPRK (note the
> > > difference, I refer to the dictatorship, not the oppressed masses who
> > > suffer) is evil, or it isn't. (it is, all Stalinist regiimes are)
>
> Is the DPRK evil or not? I missed where you answered this one, Dave!
Whoops! Let me clarify: Inasmuch as we have previously agreed that
communist nations are evil (as opposed to Dubya's fire-&-brimstone pulpit
definition of evil), then I agree that DPRK is evil.
> > Not that the DPRK isn't a problem in its own right, but the current
> > escalation from crisis-in-the-background to catastrophe-waiting-to-happen
> > seems truly to have resulted from the policies of the current
> > administration, rather than from the actions of the prior admin.
>
> Pin it on the current administration, eh? That's quite the stretch, even for
> you, Dave!
Nice usage, once again!
> I'm completely happy to place most of the blame for where we are now on the
> Agreed Framework, which was a nice little work of appeasement. Surely you agree?
I'm not sure, and alas I'm not wholly conversant with The Agreed
Framework. If you're talking about the oil-to-DPNK in exchange for IAEA
inspector access and all the rest, then I think it was at least in principle
a good plan, or not a terribly bad one, all things considered. And if its
intent was to slow the DPNK's nuclear program, it seems to have worked for a
while...
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
