To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19619
19618  |  19620
Subject: 
Re: "gutless" bush?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 20:34:54 GMT
Viewed: 
337 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Johann writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

I seem to remember he ran around like a headless chicken? How many bases did
he hide in? How long was it before he spoke to the nation? Rather than
leading your country in a time of need, he chose to hide under his bed. His
own words: ?I was trying to get out of harm's way.?
Give the man a medal!

Hmm...last time I checked, it is US policy to remove the president from
harm's way aka the White House. That doesn't sound like running to me.
Perhaps when a threat to national security occurs, we should just have the
president step out on the White House lawn and await whatever reprisal happens?

I hope the sarcasm wasn't lost on you...

  Not lost, but misplaced.  No one really thinks that Dubya should have
leapt to the front lines as soon as danger reared its head (though that
might have been nice), but he should have addressed the nation much more
promptly than he did, and he could have done so easily without exposing
himself to danger or disclosing his location.  Instead, Dubya had to wait
until he was informed of his opinion the matter, and then he had to wait
until his speechwriters could pen something with words small enough for him
to read on camera.

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: "gutless" bush?
 
(...) No, he had to wait until the Secter Service was satisfied that the he was relatively safe from harm and separated from Cheney. -Dave J. (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "gutless" bush?
 
(...) Hmm...last time I checked, it is US policy to remove the president from harm's way aka the White House. That doesn't sound like running to me. Perhaps when a threat to national security occurs, we should just have the president step out on the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

65 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR