To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19537
19536  |  19538
Subject: 
Re: "gutless" bush?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:43:26 GMT
Viewed: 
1522 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> 
> > I seem to remember he ran around like a headless chicken? How many bases did
> > he hide in? How long was it before he spoke to the nation? Rather than leading
> > your country in a time of need, he chose to hide under his bed. His own words:
> > ?I was trying to get out of harm's way.?
> 
> Those weren't his decisions, but of the secret service.  It is their job to
> ensure his safety-- they did what they felt prudent.

What about his duty?

> You are a cretin to imply
> otherwise.

youch!

> 
> > > > 
> > > > Also, how did he avoid the draft in ?68? Was it because:
> > > > a) he was too drunk?
> > > > b) he was too stupid?
> > > > c) he was disallowed as monkeys can't fly planes?
> > > > d) daddy fixed it so he did not have to serve his country?
> 
> > Draft-dodge tale threatens Bush's run for presidency
> > http://www.guardian.co.uk/US_election_race/Story/0,2763,202917,00.html
> 
> Why would that be?  Because his opponent was such a war hero?  What about his
> predecessor?  What is your point?

My point is that he is "gutless"!

> Merely more blathering?


> > 
> > > 
> > > I fail to "get" your winkies.
> > 
> > Being obtuse again?
> 
> Trolling again?

How ironic!

Scott A


> 
> JOHN



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: "gutless" bush?
 
(...) What do you think President Thomas J. Whitmore would have done? ;) Scott A (24 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: "gutless" bush?
 
(...) Are you implying that it is his duty to get *in* harm's way? That he can't do his duty in safety? I would submit that it is a large part of his duty to *not* get killed-- an event that would have serious national implications. All hell broke (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "gutless" bush?
 
(...) Those weren't his decisions, but of the secret service. It is their job to ensure his safety-- they did what they felt prudent. You are a cretin to imply otherwise. (...) predecessor? What is your point? Merely more blathering? (...) Trolling (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

65 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR