To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19537
19536  |  19538
Subject: 
Re: "gutless" bush?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:43:26 GMT
Viewed: 
341 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

I seem to remember he ran around like a headless chicken? How many bases did
he hide in? How long was it before he spoke to the nation? Rather than leading
your country in a time of need, he chose to hide under his bed. His own words:
?I was trying to get out of harm's way.?

Those weren't his decisions, but of the secret service.  It is their job to
ensure his safety-- they did what they felt prudent.

What about his duty?

You are a cretin to imply
otherwise.

youch!



Also, how did he avoid the draft in ?68? Was it because:
a) he was too drunk?
b) he was too stupid?
c) he was disallowed as monkeys can't fly planes?
d) daddy fixed it so he did not have to serve his country?

Draft-dodge tale threatens Bush's run for presidency
http://www.guardian.co.uk/US_election_race/Story/0,2763,202917,00.html

Why would that be?  Because his opponent was such a war hero?  What about his
predecessor?  What is your point?

My point is that he is "gutless"!

Merely more blathering?




I fail to "get" your winkies.

Being obtuse again?

Trolling again?

How ironic!

Scott A



JOHN



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: "gutless" bush?
 
(...) What do you think President Thomas J. Whitmore would have done? ;) Scott A (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: "gutless" bush?
 
(...) Are you implying that it is his duty to get *in* harm's way? That he can't do his duty in safety? I would submit that it is a large part of his duty to *not* get killed-- an event that would have serious national implications. All hell broke (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "gutless" bush?
 
(...) Those weren't his decisions, but of the secret service. It is their job to ensure his safety-- they did what they felt prudent. You are a cretin to imply otherwise. (...) predecessor? What is your point? Merely more blathering? (...) Trolling (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

65 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR