To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19599
19598  |  19600
Subject: 
Re: "gutless" bush?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 18:57:33 GMT
Viewed: 
524 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:

Why?  Eventually they'll all starve to death or revolt.  The ostensible
target of North Korea (South Korea) doesn't want us raising a ruckus, so why
do so?

2004:

DPRK: Give us food, or Seoul gets it... you know we can do it, you saw that
nuke that OBL set off earlier this year? That was us. And we made more.

I don't drive a Hyundai, go ahead!  Seoul is the one that requested we show
restraint, so I don't have a problem with them eating the consequences.


RoK: OK, I guess so, but just this one time...

2005:

DPRK: Give us food AND a good stock of Anime and DVD players to play it on,
or Tokyo gets it... we hear Cowboy Bebop is especially good...

Oh dang, I drive a Mazda.  Time to switch to that BMW, I guess.  Anime?
They are welcome to it.  Tokyo is overpopulated anyway, and at least this
way Japan can whine about someone else nuking them.


Japan: OK, but just this one time...

2006:

DPRK: Give us food AND a new Hyundai for every apparatchik in the country or
Seoul gets it...

I'll happily give 'em what they want (in this country, they are called
"lawyers").  Won that exchange!  Thank you, NK!!!  I'll even throw in
telephone soliciters!


RoK: Ok but just this once, really. No more. I mean it...

Rinse, lather, repeat, ad nauseum.

No, I don't think the starve em out strategy is going to work. Besides, even
if it would, that enables the clueless twits (and some sympathetic nice guys
who enable their behaviour, yes DK, I'm talking to you...) that post here to
place the blame for the failure of the DPRK Stalinist regime on the feet of
the US.

They are currently starving, so it's just a matter of time.


Remember... it's OUR fault that SH starves babies to death instead of
disarming! It's not HIS fault for not doing what he promised, it was ours
for patiently going along with the UN sanctions in hope they work.

No, but it isn't our problem, either.


Sorry for the UN bashing but it's just so darn easy.

An absense of resolve, or an absense of skill on Dubya's part.

-->Bruce<--



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "gutless" bush?
 
(...) 2004: DPRK: Give us food, or Seoul gets it... you know we can do it, you saw that nuke that OBL set off earlier this year? That was us. And we made more. RoK: OK, I guess so, but just this one time... 2005: DPRK: Give us food AND a good stock (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

65 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR